N.M. Stat. Ann. § 58-1-75
A. In liquidating a state bank, the commissioner [director of the financial institutions division of the regulation and licensing department] may exercise any power thereof but he shall not, without the approval of the court in which notice of possession has been filed:
E. As soon after the commencement of liquidation as practicable the commissioner [director] shall:
(2) include with the liquidation notices sent by mail:
F. Within six months after the last day specified in the notice for the filing of claims, or a longer period allowed by the court in which the notice of possession was filed, the commissioner [director] shall:
H. The following claims shall have priority in the order named:
History: 1953 Comp., § 48-22-63, enacted by Laws 1963, ch. 305, § 63.
Bracketed material. — The bracketed material was inserted by the compiler and is not part of the law.
Cross references. — For Uniform Unclaimed Property Act (1995), see 7-8A-30 NMSA 1978.
Purpose of article. — Laws 1915, ch. 67, § 86, was passed to obviate the cumbersome and expensive method formerly prevailing, under which creditors and not the receiver enforced the stockholders' liability. Melaven v. Schmidt, 1929-NMSC-100, 34 N.M. 443, 283 P. 900; Clapp v. Smith, 1916-NMSC-048, 22 N.M. 153, 159 P. 523; Maddison v. Bryan, 1926-NMSC-007, 31 N.M. 404, 247 P. 275.
Laws 1933, ch. 32, § 1, is not a mandatory statute requiring the judicial department to appoint the state bank examiner receiver of an insolvent bank, or providing that no receiver shall be appointed by the court except upon application of the attorney general. Cooper v. Otero, 1934-NMSC-008, 38 N.M. 164, 29 P.2d 341 (decided under former law).
Statute is only a recommendation to the judiciary. — Formerly, it was held that the provision of Laws 1933, ch. 32, § 1, that the court "shall appoint the state bank examiner as such receiver" amounts to no more in an equity proceeding than a recommendation to the judiciary to appoint him; otherwise the enactment would violate N.M. Const., art. VI, § 13. Cooper v. Otero, 1934-NMSC-008, 38 N.M. 164, 29 P.2d 341.
Court aid to wind up affairs. — Under former law, it was held that no state officer has authority to wind up the affairs of an insolvent bank without the aid of a court. Cooper v. Otero, 1934-NMSC-008, 38 N.M. 164, 29 P.2d 341.
Judge with discretion as to receiver appointment. — The district judge to whom application for appointment of receiver for insolvent bank was made under Laws 1921, ch. 134, was not bound to appoint the state bank examiner receiver, but could exercise discretion and appoint another as held under former law. State ex rel. Read v. Ryan, 1922-NMSC-011, 27 N.M. 651, 204 P. 68.
Officer's power of possession only preliminary to court action. — In this state, under former law, it was held that power conferred upon the state banking officer to take possession of a state bank is only preliminary to court action, in order to give the state officer more than temporary standing. Cooper v. Otero, 1934-NMSC-008, 38 N.M. 164, 29 P.2d 341.
Receiver of insolvent bank is not representative of creditors with power to institute a suit for the recovery of the added liability of stockholders as was formerly held. Clapp v. Smith, 1916-NMSC-048, 22 N.M. 153, 159 P. 523.
Stockholders' liability enforceable by receiver. — Under Laws 1915, ch. 67, § 86, it was formerly held that statutory liability of stockholders of a bank which has failed is an asset in the hands of the receiver, who may enforce it in the course of liquidation without awaiting final determination of fact or amount of deficiency of assets. Maddison v. Bryan, 1926-NMSC-007, 31 N.M. 404, 247 P. 275.
Person maintaining suit. — Laws 1933, ch. 32, § 1, contains no direction as to the name of the person in whose name the suit shall be maintained. Cooper v. Otero, 1934-NMSC-008, 38 N.M. 164, 29 P.2d 341.
Winding up decree to be liberally construed. — It was held under former law that in a statutory proceeding to wind up an insolvent bank, a decree which was inaccurately worded should not be subjected to a fine analysis, but should be taken with the purpose of the statute in view. Cooper v. Manning, 1935-NMSC-038, 39 N.M. 206, 43 P.2d 1055.
Distribution of assets of insolvent state bank is governed by general incorporation laws. State v. Bank of Magdalena, 1928-NMSC-048, 33 N.M. 473, 270 P. 881, distinguished, State v. State Bank, 1934-NMSC-046, 38 N.M. 338, 32 P.2d 1017 (decided under former law).
Preferences and setoffs are governed by the general incorporation laws for the winding up of insolvent corporations. State v. Bank of Magdalena, 1928-NMSC-048, 33 N.M. 473, 270 P. 881, distinguished, State v. State Bank, 1934-NMSC-046, 38 N.M. 338, 32 P.2d 1017 (decided under former law).
State preference lost after receiver appointed. — It was held under former law that where a receiver has been appointed for an insolvent state bank, the state is not entitled to a preference over other creditors, as to money on deposit at the time the receiver was appointed. State v. First State Bank, 1917-NMSC-047, 22 N.M. 661, 167 P. 3, 1918A L.R.A. 394, distinguished, State v. People's Sav. Bank & Trust Co., 1917-NMSC-060, 23 N.M. 282, 168 P. 526.
Deposits of the state in an insolvent bank lose priority of payment when the assets of such bank are turned over to the hands of a receiver. State v. People's Sav. Bank & Trust Co., 1917-NMSC-060, 23 N.M. 282, 168 P. 526 (decided under former law).
Subsequent purchaser cannot engage in savings and loan business when association liquidated. — When the assets of a savings and loan association are liquidated by a receiver pursuant to an order of the court, the association is terminated and its "charter" or authority to transact business is terminated as well. Therefore, no "charter" or valid franchise remains entitling a subsequent purchaser to engage in the savings and loan business. 1981 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 81-22.
Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — 10 Am. Jur. 2d Banks § 765.
Right of owner of check which the drawer bank held for him at time it closed its doors to a preference, 17 A.L.R. 196.
Status of Christmas club deposits as savings or as general deposit, 21 A.L.R. 1128.
Trust or preference in respect of money placed in bank for purpose of transaction with third persons, 31 A.L.R. 472, 93 A.L.R. 881.
Specified obligations, preference in respect of deposits designated for payment of, 32 A.L.R. 967.
Prerogative right of county or other political subdivision to preference, 36 A.L.R. 640, 52 A.L.R. 755, 90 A.L.R. 208.
Taxes, preference in favor of individuals as to funds deposited by them to credit of public treasurer in attempt to pay, 37 A.L.R. 130.
Clearinghouse settlement, balance due other banks on, as preferred claim against insolvent bank, 44 A.L.R. 1535.
Securities deposited in bank, rights of owners of, upon its insolvency, 51 A.L.R. 914, 84 A.L.R. 1534, 126 A.L.R. 625.
Right of holder of certified check to preference out of assets of insolvent bank, 51 A.L.R. 1034.
Right in absence of statute to preference in respect of deposit of public funds in insolvent bank, 51 A.L.R. 1336, 65 A.L.R. 690, 103 A.L.R. 621.
Prerogative right of state to preference at common law, 65 A.L.R. 1331, 90 A.L.R. 184, 167 A.L.R. 640.
Estoppel as regards claim against insolvent bank, 69 A.L.R. 456.
Depositor's right to preference in assets of insolvent bank because dissuaded by bank officials or employees from withdrawing deposit after insolvency, 80 A.L.R. 795.
Veteran's compensation or war risk insurance proceeds or pension money, preference in respect of deposit of, 83 A.L.R. 1089, 84 A.L.R. 1530.
Paper of insolvent bank, issuance or receipt of, as converting trust relation into debtor and creditor relation so as to defeat preference, 92 A.L.R. 1244.
Depositor's right to priority as based upon fact of bank's pledge of his note rendered deposit unavailable as set off against note in hands of pledgee, 162 A.L.R. 1175.
9 C.J.S. Banks and Banking § 184.