N.M. Stat. Ann. § 52-9-5
F. At all times, two of the governor's appointees to the board shall be public members who have general expertise in workers' compensation, but they shall not be employed by or represent policyholders of the company. Of the remaining six appointed or elected board members, excluding the company president, three directors shall be managers or represent the management of policyholders of the company and three directors shall be nonmanagement employees or represent the nonmanagement employees of policyholders of the company, subject to the following restrictions:
(6) any director who has served a full six-year term shall not be eligible for another term until one year after the end of his term.
The provisions of this subsection that apply to managers or representatives of management and nonmanagement employees or representatives of nonmanagement employees of policyholders shall, in the case of the governor's initial director appointments, apply instead to the management and nonmanagement employees of any employer in the state.
History: Laws 1990 (2nd S.S.), ch. 2, § 125; 1991, ch. 134, § 1.
The 1991 amendment, effective June 14, 1991, substituted "eight members" for "six members" in Subsection A; substituted "eight directors" for "six directors" and "ninth member" for "seventh member" in Subsection C; in Subsection D, substituted "eight directors" for "six directors" and "three directors" for "two directors" in two places in the first sentence, substituted "three initial directors" for "two initial directors" and "two directors" for "one director" in the fourth sentence, rewrote the fifth sentence which read "At the expiration of the terms of the two initial directors whose terms are six years, the policyholders shall elect two directors for full six-year terms" and substituted "five directors" for "two directors" and "three directors" for "four directors" in the final sentence; deleted former Subsection F, relating to termination of the governor's power to appoint directors; designated former Subsections G to J as Subsections F to I; in Subsection F, rewrote the introductory paragraph, substituted "five members" for "four members" in Paragraph (2) and "two members" for "one member" in Paragraph (5) and deleted "six" preceding "director appointments" in the final sentence of the Subsection; and added the final sentence in Subsection H.
No jurisdiction over claims between insurers. — The workers’ compensation administration does not have jurisdiction over a controversy between workers’ compensation insurers that has no effect on the rights of the worker. Jones v. Holiday Inn Express, 2014-NMCA-082.
Where worker sustained a back injury; thirteen days before the accident, the employer changed worker’s compensation carriers from plaintiff to defendant; unaware of the change, the employer’s manager gave notice to plaintiff of worker’s claim for benefits; without researching whether the employer was insured through plaintiff, plaintiff accepted the claim and began paying benefits to worker; plaintiff also erred by miscalculating the amount of benefits which gave worker 700 weeks instead of 500 weeks of benefits; when plaintiff discovered the error, plaintiff filed a complaint with the workers’ compensation administration requesting that the workers’ compensation judge order defendant to pay future benefits to worker and to reimburse the benefits paid by plaintiff, the workers’ compensation administration lacked jurisdiction over the controversy because the controversy did not involve or affect worker’s claim for compensation. Jones v. Holiday Inn Express, 2014-NMCA-082.