N.M. Stat. Ann. § 52-1-7
F. For purposes of this section:
History: 1953 Comp., § 59-10-4.1, enacted by Laws 1975, ch. 284, § 4; 1979, ch. 368, § 5; 1987, ch. 235, § 8; 1993, ch. 193, § 2; 2003, ch. 259, § 3.
Cross references. — For employers who come within act, see 52-1-2 NMSA 1978.
For coverage by state agencies, see 52-1-3 NMSA 1978.
For application of provisions of act, see 52-1-6 NMSA 1978.
For definition of workman, see 52-1-16 NMSA 1978.
The 2003 amendment, effective June 20, 2003, inserted "or limited liability company" following "or business corporation" twice in Subsection A; inserted "or limited liability company" following "or business corporation" at the end of Subsection C; inserted "or limited liability companies" following "all corporations or" near the end of Subsection D; and inserted "or a ten percent ownership interest in the limited liability company" near the end of Subsection F(1).
The 1993 amendment, effective June 18, 1993, in the section heading, substituted "executive" for "corporations' " and added "or sole proprietors" at the end; in Subsection A, inserted "executive", deleted "as defined in Subsection F of this section" following "employee", and inserted "or a sole proprietor"; in Subsection B, inserted "executive" and "or sole proprietor"; in Subsection C, inserted "executive" and "or sole proprietor" in the first sentence and substituted "An executive" for "The" in the third sentence; in Subsection D, substituted "an executive" for "such" and inserted "or sole proprietor" in the first sentence, and inserted "executive" in the second sentence; inserted "executive" in Subsection E; and, in Subsection F, deleted the Paragraph (2) designation which formerly appeared before what now reads "or other" in Paragraph (1), added present Paragraph (2), substituted "executive employee" for "executive officer" and "or other" for " 'employee' means an" in Paragraph (1), and made several minor stylistic changes.
Exemption of sole executive employee does not exempt the employer. — Executive employees may exempt themselves from coverage under the Workers’ Compensation Act, but are still counted in determining whether their employer is subject to the act. Jackson Constr., Inc. v. Smith, 2012-NMCA-033, 277 P.3d 470.
Where the sole owner of an incorporated construction company was the president and sole board member of the company; the company did not employ any workers or executives other than the owner; the owner elected to exempt the owner from coverage under the Workers’ Compensation Act pursuant to Section 52-1-7 NMSA 1978, and the owner acknowledged that the owner was an employee of the company, the company was subject to the act and was required to procure worker’s compensation insurance. Jackson Constr., Inc. v. Smith, 2012-NMCA-033, 277 P.3d 470.
Directors and officers held not "employees". — Where corporate payments to directors and officers represented repayment of loans, not wages or salary, the directors and officers were not "workers" as contemplated by this section. Garcia v. Watson Tile Works, Inc., 1990-NMCA-126, 111 N.M. 209, 803 P.2d 1114.
Law reviews. — For survey of 1990-91 workers' compensation law, see 22 N.M.L. Rev. 845 (1992).
Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — 82 Am. Jur. 2d Workers' Compensation § 175.
99 C.J.S. Workmen's Compensation § 82.