N.M. Stat. Ann. § 50-9-21
C. All information reported to or otherwise obtained by the secretary or the secretary's authorized representative in connection with any inspection or proceeding under this section which contains or might reveal a trade secret, as defined in Paragraph (2) of this subsection, shall be considered confidential, except that such information may be disclosed to other officers or employees concerned with carrying out the Occupational Health and Safety Act. In any such proceeding, the secretary, the secretary's authorized representative or a court of competent jurisdiction, as the case may be, shall issue such orders as may be appropriate to protect the confidentiality of trade secrets.
History: 1953 Comp., § 59-14-20, enacted by Laws 1972, ch. 63, § 20; 1975, ch. 290, § 13; 1983, ch. 49, § 2; 1984, ch. 80, § 2; 1993, ch. 322, § 19.
The 1993 amendment, effective April 8, 1993, substituted "department" for "agency" in Subsection B and Paragraph (1) of Subsection C; substituted "secretary" for "director" in two places in the introductory paragraph of Subsection C; and made minor stylistic changes in Subsections A and C.
Regulations do not affect employer's liability under Workers' Compensation Act. — Regulations adopted under the authority of the state Occupational Health and Safety Act do not affect an employer's liability under the Workers' Compensation Act, and safety devices required by such regulations are not required by law for purposes of Section 52-1-10B NMSA 1978. Casillas v. S.W.I.G., 1981-NMCA-045, 96 N.M. 84, 628 P.2d 329, cert. denied, 96 N.M. 116, 628 P.2d 686, and appeal dismissed, 454 U.S. 934, 102 S. Ct. 467, 70 L. Ed. 2d 242 (1981).
OSHA violations as evidence of negligence. — Occupational Safety and Health Act violations do not constitute a basis for assigning negligence as a matter of law, but evidence of such violations can be considered in determining the required standard of care. Valdez v. Cillessen & Son Inc., 1987-NMSC-015, 105 N.M. 575, 734 P.2d 1258.
Modification of benefits using OSHA regulations precluded. — The use of OSHA regulations to modify an employee's workers' compensation benefits is clearly precluded under Subsection A. Bateman v. Springer Bldg. Materials Corp., 1989-NMCA-039, 108 N.M. 655, 777 P.2d 383, cert. denied, 108 N.M. 681, 777 P.2d 1325.
Law reviews. — For annual survey of New Mexico law relating to workers' compensation, see 13 N.M.L. Rev. 495 (1983).
Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — 61 Am. Jur. 2d Plant and Job Safety - OSHA and State Laws §§ 131, 132, 137.
Employer's tort liability to worker for concealing workplace hazard or nature or extent of injury, 9 A.L.R.4th 778.
Liability of labor union for injury or death allegedly resulting from unsafe working conditions, 14 A.L.R.4th 1161.
What constitutes "trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from person and privileged or confidential", exempt from disclosure under Freedom of Information Act (5 USCS § 552 (b)(4)) (FOIA), 139 A.L.R. Fed. 225.