N.M. Stat. Ann. § 47-8-39
A. An owner may not retaliate against a resident who is in compliance with the rental agreement and not otherwise in violation of any provision of the Uniform Owner-Resident Relations Act by increasing rent, decreasing services or by bringing or threatening to bring an action for possession because the resident has within the previous six months:
History: 1953 Comp., § 70-7-39, enacted by Laws 1975, ch. 38, § 39; 1989, ch. 253, § 1; 1995, ch. 195, § 18; 1999, ch. 91, § 6.
The 1999 amendment, effective June 18, 1999, substituted "six months" for "three months" near the end of the introductory language of Subsection A and made a minor stylistic change.
The 1995 amendment, effective July 1, 1995, in subsection A, deleted "Except as provided in this section" from the beginning, added "the resident has within the previous three months:" to the end, deleted "the resident, who is in compliance with the rental agreement and not otherwise in violation of any provision of that act, has" from the beginning of Paragraph (1), inserted "association" following "union" in Paragraph (2), substituted all the language at the end of Paragraph (3) beginning "the Uniform Owner-Resident Relations Act" for "that act", and added Paragraphs (4) to (7); in Subsection B, substituted "remedies provided in 47-8-48" for "remedies provided in 47-8-29", substituted "the violation shall be a defense in any action" for "has a defense in action", and deleted "Nothing in this section shall be construed as prohibiting reasonable rent increases or changes in services notwithstanding the occurence of acts specified in Subsection A of this section" from the end of Subsection B; added Subsection C; and made minor stylistic changes throughout the section.
The 1989 amendment, effective June 16, 1989, added Subsection A(3), and made minor stylistic changes throughout the section.
Action uniform to all tenants. — Where the owner's decision to discontinue participation in the housing program was to be uniformly applied to all of the low-income tenants as their leases expired, the tenant could not base her retaliation defense on the owner's decision to discontinue the program. Carol Rickert & Assocs. v. Law, 2002-NMCA-096, 132 N.M. 687, 54 P.3d 91.
No right to complain about neighbors. — Subsection A(3) does not bar an owner's otherwise proper action for possession of the premises after termination of a month-to-month residency, where the owner is retaliating against the resident for complaining about noisy neighbors. Casa Blanca Mobile Home Park v. Hill, 1998-NMCA-094, 125 N.M. 465, 963 P.2d 542.
Law reviews. — For survey, "The Uniform Owner-Resident Relations Act," see 6 N.M.L. Rev. 293 (1976).
Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — Retaliatory eviction of tenant for reporting landlord's violation of law, 23 A.L.R.5th 140.