N.M. Stat. Ann. § 47-6-9
A. The board of county commissioners of each county shall regulate subdivisions within the county's boundaries. In regulating subdivisions, the board of county commissioners of each county shall adopt regulations setting forth the county's requirements for:
C. Nothing in the New Mexico Subdivision Act shall be construed to limit the authority of counties to adopt subdivision regulations with requirements that are more stringent than the requirements set forth in the New Mexico Subdivision Act, provided that:
History: 1953 Comp., § 70-5-9, enacted by Laws 1973, ch. 348, § 9; 1981, ch. 148, § 3; 1995, ch. 212, § 9; 2003, ch. 322, § 1; 2005, ch. 139, § 2.
The 2005 amendment, effective June 17, 2005, added Subsection D to provide that the board of county commissioners of a class A county with a population greater that three hundred thousand may delegate authority to review and approve plats to an administrative officer or to the planning commission.
The 2003 amendment, effective June 20, 2003, deleted former Subsections C and D, concerning when counties shall adopt regulations pursuant to the section, and redesignated former Subsection E as present Subsection C; rewrote present Subsection C to create present Subsection C and Paragraph C(1) and added Paragraphs C(2) and C(3).
The 1995 amendment, effective July 1, 1996, rewrote the section to such an extent that a detailed comparison would be impracticable.
Formerly, board without power to regulate development. — Prior to enactment of the New Mexico Subdivision Act, the power to adopt, promulgate and enforce subdivision regulations had not been delegated to the board of county commissioners, and regulations which purported to empower it to order a phased development were utterly void. El Dorado at Santa Fe, Inc. v. Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs, 1976-NMSC-029, 89 N.M. 313, 551 P.2d 1360.
Standards may be broad. — Standards adopted pursuant to the New Mexico Subdivision Act may be broad, general standards, so long as they are capable of reasonable application and are sufficient to limit and define the board's discretionary powers. Parker v. Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs, 1979-NMSC-101, 93 N.M. 641, 603 P.2d 1098.
Effect of noncompliance with plat approval prerequisites. — Where the subdivider fails to meet the conditions he agreed to accomplish and which were required by the county as a prerequisite to plat approval, suspension or revocation of plat approval remain realities for the developer until the subdivider complies with the reasonable conditions imposed by the county within its authority. Parker v. Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs, 1979-NMSC-101, 93 N.M. 641, 603 P.2d 1098.
When resubdivision must comply with current subdivision standards. — The later resubdivision or alteration of or amendment to pre-1973 subdivisions must comply with the new, current subdivision standards if such resubdivision activity substantially affects the new regulated areas of concern which are addressed by the new 1973 New Mexico Subdivision Act (i.e., sufficiency of water, quality of water, roads, etc.). 1982 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 82-11.
If proposed alterations to a pre-1973 subdivision involve a wholesale vacating of an entire platted area and subsequent transfer of those vacated lots into a previously unplatted area, such resubdivision efforts rise to the level of an entirely new subdivision which would require the subdivider to apply for subdivision approval under the 1973 New Mexico Subdivision Act as a "new" subdivision. 1982 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 82-11.
Duties of county commission relating to plat amendments. — If the county commission determines that amendments to a pre-1973 plat are merely minor adjustments of boundaries, the amendments fall within the scope of the 47-6-2 I(7) NMSA 1978 exemption from the 1973 definition of "subdivision" and no reevaluation under the 1973 New Mexico Subdivision Act is triggered. If the commission concludes, on the other hand, that the plat amendments constitute a major revision of the original subdivision, the 1973 standards apply. In either event, the county commission must examine the proposed amendments to the old plats to make such a determination. 1982 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 82-11.
Selective compliance with current regulations permitted. — The county commission may require compliance, on a selective basis, with only those current subdivision regulations and minimum standards that are, or may be, actually affected by a proposed resubdivision. 1982 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 82-11.
Law reviews. — For note, "Gabaldon v. Sanchez : New Developments in the Law of Nuisance, Negligence and Trespass," see 9 N.M.L. Rev. 367 (1979).
For article, "Access to Solar Energy: The Problem and its Current Status," see 22 Nat. Res. J. 21 (1982).
For note, "Definitional Loopholes Limit New Mexico Counties' Authority to Regulate Subdivisions," see 24 Nat. Res. J. 1083 (1984).
For article, "Rural Development Considerations for Growth Management," see 43 Nat. Res. J. 781 (2003).
Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — 83 Am. Jur. 2d Zoning and Planning §§ 518 to 527, 531 to 534, 562 to 574.
Constitutionality, construction, and application of statutes regulating the subdivision or development of land for sale or lease in lots or parcels, 122 A.L.R. 501.
63 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations §§ 1049, 1051, 1061, 1064.