N.M. Stat. Ann. § 42A-1-19
History: 1978 Comp., § 42A-1-19, enacted by Laws 1981, ch. 125, § 15.
Landowner is not entitled to compensation for loss of business resulting to him because of opening up of a more convenient route whereby traffic is diverted from his door since there is no vested right in the flow of public travel. Board of Cnty. Comm'rs v. Slaughter, 1945-NMSC-019, 49 N.M. 141, 158 P.2d 859.
Warrants for amount of award. — Where the clerk issued warrants to attorneys for condemnees for amounts of awards in eminent domain, but these warrants were not delivered to or endorsed by condemnees and funds that were deposited with clerk remained in hands of clerk, condemnees had not received benefit from judgment and were not barred from appealing judgment. AT & T Co. v. Walker, 1967-NMSC-049, 77 N.M. 755, 427 P.2d 267.
Proceedings initiated by filing petition continue through appeal. — In condemnation proceedings, the proceedings initiated by filing petition in district court for appointment of commissioners, continued through the appellate proceedings in the district court, and did not terminate with the confirmation of the commissioners' report by the district court. State ex rel. Weltmer v. Taylor, 1938-NMSC-035, 42 N.M. 405, 79 P.2d 937.
Final judgment confirms commissioners' report. — In condemnation proceeding by the state highway commission [state transportation commission], the order confirming the commissioners' report in the final judgment fixing the damages for the properties taken. State ex rel. State Hwy. Comm'n v. Marquez, 1960-NMSC-099, 67 N.M. 353, 355 P.2d 287.
Effect of irregularity on final judgment. — The failure of commissioners, appointed to appraise land condemned, to include description and other details, is an irregularity but does not authorize the vacation of a final judgment awarding damages. Board of Cnty. Comm'rs v. Wasson, 1933-NMSC-076, 37 N.M. 503, 24 P.2d 1098.
Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — 26 Am. Jur. 2d Eminent Domain §§ 27 et seq., 268 et seq.; 27 Am. Jur. 2d Eminent Domain §§ 293, 459 et seq., 511 et seq., 555, 704, 705, 709, 710, 822, 825, 826, 828.
Right to compensation for damages to land left outside of levee, 20 A.L.R. 302.
Right under constitutional provision against taking or damaging, to recover in other than an eminent domain proceeding, for consequential damages to property no part of which is taken, 20 A.L.R. 516.
Right of abutting owner to compensation for railroad in street under constitutional provision against damaging property for public use without compensation, 22 A.L.R. 145.
Right of abutting owner to compensation for interference with access by bridge or other structure in public street or highway, 45 A.L.R. 534.
Valuation at time of original wrongful entry by condemnor or at time of subsequent initiation of condemnation proceedings, 2 A.L.R.3d 1038.
Zoning factor in determination of damages in eminent domain, 9 A.L.R.3d 291.
Good will as element of damages for condemnation of property on which private business is conducted, 81 A.L.R.3d 198.
Eminent domain: unity or contiguity of separate properties sufficient to allow damages for diminished value of parcel remaining after taking of other parcel, 59 A.L.R.4th 308.
Referee's failure to file report within time specified by statute, court order, or stipulation as terminating reference, 71 A.L.R.4th 889.
29A C.J.S. Eminent Domain §§ 229 to 231, 286 to 338.