N.M. Stat. Ann. § 42-9-17
The manner of serving writs of attachement [attachment] shall be as follows:
History: C.L. 1897, § 2685 (193), added by Laws 1907, ch. 107, § 1 (193); Laws 1909, ch. 63, § 33; Code 1915, § 4310; C.S. 1929, § 105-1612; Laws 1939, ch. 159, § 4; 1941 Comp., § 22-117; 1953 Comp., § 26-1-17; Laws 1961, ch. 96, § 11-104.
Bracketed material. — The bracketed material was inserted by the compiler and is not part of the law.
Cross references. — For notice of levy on real estate, filing, recording and indexing, see 39-4-4, 39-4-5 NMSA 1978.
For levy on cattle, see 39-6-1 to 39-6-4 NMSA 1978.
Substituted service permissible. — Service of an attachment issued on an affidavit showing that the defendant has absconded and absented himself from his usual place of abode may be made by leaving a true copy thereof at the usual place of abode of the defendant with some suitable person, and publication is not necessary. Bell v. Gaylord, 1891-NMSC-032, 6 N.M. 227, 27 P. 494; Spiegelberg v. Sullivan, 1873-NMSC-009, 1 N.M. 575 (decided under former law).
Filing of lis pendens notice authorized when writ seizes realty. — Writ of attachment, under which real estate is seized, affects the title to the real estate, and authorizes the filing of lis pendens notice. Bell v. Gaylord, 1891-NMSC-032, 6 N.M. 227, 27 P. 494 (decided under former law).
Judgment rendered during vacation void. — In action for assumpsit by attachment (now ordinary action of contract), where garnishment process was served on the defendant, judgment rendered during vacation was void. Staab v. Atlantic & Pac. R.R., 1886-NMSC-015, 3 N.M. (Gild.) 606, 9 P. 381 (decided under former law).
When writ of attachment has been discharged, jurisdiction to order the garnishee to perform or desist from performing any particular act is thereby terminated. Albuquerque Nat'l Bank v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 1967-NMSC-068, 77 N.M. 603, 426 P.2d 204.
Personal and immediate custody over property not required. — It is not essential to the keeping of attached property in custodia legis that the sheriff maintain personal and immediate custody over it, and he may do so indirectly through his servant or through a custodian appointed by him and responsible to him. Hart v. Oliver Farm Equip. Sales Co., 1933-NMSC-037, 37 N.M. 267, 21 P.2d 96.
A valid attachment lien, created by constructive seizure and appointment of custodian, was not lost by mere temporary absence of custodian from premises where the property was situated. Hart v. Oliver Farm Equip. Sales Co., 1933-NMSC-037, 37 N.M. 267, 21 P.2d 96 (decided under former law).
Effect of judgment against attached property. — A legal judgment against attached property is a prerequisite to a valid judgment against garnishee. Smith v. Montoya, 1883-NMSC-010, 3 N.M. (Gild.) 13, 1 P. 175, overruled on other grounds by Field v. Otero, 1930-NMSC-060, 35 N.M. 68, 290 P. 1015 (decided under former law).
Law reviews. — For article, "Attachment in New Mexico - Part I," see 1 Nat. Resources J. 303 (1961).
For article, "Attachment in New Mexico - Part II," see 2 Nat. Resources J. 75 (1962).
Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — 6 Am. Jur. 2d Attachment and Garnishment §§ 295, 319, 344, 562.
Service of process on foreign corporation doing business in state, 113 A.L.R. 140.
Foreign corporation as a nonresident for purposes of attachment law of state in which it is doing business or is domesticated, 114 A.L.R. 1378.
7 C.J.S. Attachment §§ 11, 70, 170 to 193, 196, 197, 199, 253, 374.