1. A. Except for punitive damages and past and future medical care and related benefits, the aggregate dollar amount recoverable by all persons for or arising from any injury or death to a patient as a result of malpractice shall not exceed six hundred thousand dollars ($600,000) per occurrence for malpractice claims brought against health care providers if the injury or death occurred prior to January 1, 2022. In jury cases, the jury shall not be given any instructions dealing with this limitation.
2. B. Except for punitive damages and past and future medical care and related benefits, the aggregate dollar amount recoverable by all persons for or arising from any injury or death to a patient as a result of malpractice shall not exceed seven hundred fifty thousand dollars ($750,000) per occurrence for malpractice claims against independent providers; provided that, beginning January 1, 2023, the per occurrence limit on recovery shall be adjusted annually by the consumer price index for all urban consumers.
3. C. The aggregate dollar amount recoverable by all persons for or arising from any injury or death to a patient as a result of malpractice, except for punitive damages and past and future medical care and related benefits, shall not exceed seven hundred fifty thousand dollars ($750,000) for claims brought against an independent outpatient health care facility; for an injury or death that occurred in calendar years 2022 and 2023.

4. D. In calendar year 2024 and subsequent years, the aggregate dollar amount recoverable by all persons for or arising from an injury or death to a patient as a result of malpractice, except for punitive damages and past and future medical care and related benefits, shall not exceed the following amounts for claims brought against an independent outpatient health care facility:

   1. (1) for an injury or death that occurred in calendar year 2024, one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence; and
   2. (2) for an injury or death that occurred in calendar year 2025 and thereafter, the amount provided in Paragraph (1) of this subsection, adjusted annually by the prior three-year average consumer price index for all urban consumers, per occurrence.

5. E. In calendar year 2022 and subsequent calendar years, the aggregate dollar amount recoverable by all persons for or arising from any injury or death to a patient as a result of malpractice, except for punitive damages and past and future medical care and related benefits, shall not exceed the following amounts for claims brought against a hospital or a hospital-controlled outpatient health care facility:

   1. (1) for an injury or death that occurred in calendar year 2022, four million dollars ($4,000,000) per occurrence;
   2. (2) for an injury or death that occurred in calendar year 2023, four million five hundred thousand dollars ($4,500,000) per occurrence;
   3. (3) for an injury or death that occurred in calendar year 2024, five million dollars ($5,000,000) per occurrence;
   4. (4) for an injury or death that occurred in calendar year 2025, five million five hundred thousand dollars ($5,500,000) per occurrence;
   5. (5) for an injury or death that occurred in calendar year 2026, six million dollars ($6,000,000) per occurrence; and
   6. (6) for an injury or death that occurred in calendar year 2027 and each calendar year thereafter, the amount provided in Paragraph (5) of this subsection, adjusted annually by the consumer price index for all urban consumers, per occurrence.
6. F. The aggregate dollar amounts provided in Subsections B through E of this section include payment to any person for any number of loss of consortium claims or other claims per occurrence that arise solely because of the injuries or death of the patient.
7. G. In jury cases, the jury shall not be given any instructions dealing with the limitations provided in this section.
8. H. The value of accrued medical care and related benefits shall not be subject to any limitation.
9. I. Except for an independent outpatient health care facility, a health care provider's personal liability is limited to two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000) for monetary damages and medical care and related benefits as provided in Section 41-5-7 NMSA 1978. Any amount due from a judgment or settlement in excess of two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000) shall be paid from the fund, except as provided in Subsections J and K of this section.
10. J. An independent outpatient health care facility's personal liability is limited to five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) for monetary damages and medical care and related benefits as provided in Section 41-5-7 NMSA 1978. Any amount due from a judgment or settlement in excess of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) shall be paid from the fund.
11. K. Amounts due from a judgment or settlement against a hospital or hospital-controlled outpatient health care facility in excess of seven hundred fifty thousand dollars ($750,000), excluding past and future medical expenses, shall be paid by the hospital or hospital-controlled outpatient health care facility and not by the fund.

History: 1978 Comp., § 41-5-6, enacted by Laws 1992, ch. 33, § 4; 2021, ch. 16, § 3; 2021 (2nd S.S.), ch. 5, § 2; 2023, ch. 207, § 3; 2026, ch. 44, § 3.

ANNOTATIONS

Repeals. — 2021 (2nd S.S.), ch. 5, § 3 repealed Laws 2021, ch. 16, § 3, effective January 1, 2022.

Repeals and reenactments. — Laws 1992, ch. 33, § 4 repealed former 41-5-6 NMSA 1978, as enacted by Laws 1992, ch. 33, § 3, and enacted a new section, effective April 1, 1995.

Laws 1991, ch. 264, § 4 repealed former 41-5-6 NMSA 1978, as amended by Laws 1991, ch. 264, § 3, and enacted a new 41-5-6 NMSA 1978, effective July 1, 1992.

Laws 1992, ch. 33, § 3 repealed former 41-5-6 NMSA 1978, as amended by Laws 1991, ch. 264, § 3, and as enacted by Laws 1991, ch. 264, § 4, and enacted a former section, effective April 1, 1992.

The 2026 amendment, effective May 20, 2026, extended patient compensation fund coverage of judgments or settlements below seven hundred fifty thousand dollars for hospitals and hospital-controlled outpatient facilities; in Subsection K, after the subsection designation, deleted "Until January 1, 2027" and deleted the last sentence of the subsection, which provided, "Beginning January 1, 2027, amounts due from a judgment or settlement against a hospital or hospital-controlled outpatient health care facility shall not be paid from the fund"; deleted former Subsection L, which provided that the term "occurrence" shall not be construed in such a way as to limit recovery to only one maximum statutory payment if separate acts or omissions cause additional or enhanced injury or harm as a result of the separate acts or omissions.

Applicability. — Laws 2026, ch. 44, § 8 provided that the provisions of Laws 2026, ch. 44 apply to all claims for medical malpractice that arise on or after May 20, 2026.

Severability. — Laws 2026, ch. 44, § 7 provided that if a provision of Laws 2026, ch. 44 or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the invalidity does not affect other provisions or applications of Laws 2026, ch. 44 that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of Laws 2026, ch. 44 are severable.

The 2023 amendment, effective June 16, 2023, revised the limitation of recovery for certain claims against facilities that are not hospital-controlled; in Subsection C, after "shall not exceed", deleted "the following amounts" and added "seven hundred fifty thousand dollars ($750,000)", after "brought against an", added "independent", after "outpatient health care facility", deleted "that is not majority-owned and -controlled by a hospital", after "calendar years 2022 and 2023", deleted "seven hundred fifty thousand dollars ($750,000) per occurrence"; deleted former Paragraphs C(2) through C(5); added a new Subsection D; redesignated former Subsections D through H as Subsections E through I, respectively; in Subsection E, in the introductory clause, after "against a hospital or", deleted "an" and added "a hospital-controlled", and after "outpatient health care facility", deleted "that is majority-owned and -controlled by a hospital"; in Subsection I, added "Except for an independent outpatient health care facility"; added a new Subsection J; redesignated former Subsections I and J as Subsections K and L, respectively; and in Subsection K, added "hospital-controlled" preceding each occurrence of "outpatient health care facility".

The 2021 (2nd S.S.) amendment, effective January 1, 2022, raised personal liability and recovery caps for legal damages in medical malpractice claims brought against certain health care providers; in Subsection A, after "Except for punitive damages and", added "past and future", and after "($600,000) per occurrence", added "for malpractice claims brought against health care providers if the injury or death occurred prior to January 1, 2022"; deleted former Subsection B, which provided "The value of accrued medical care and related benefits shall not be subject to the six hundred thousand dollar ($600,000) limitation", added new Subsections B through F, and redesignated former Subsections C and D as Subsections G and H, respectively; in Subsection G, deleted "Monetary damages" and added "The value of accrued medical care and related benefits", after "shall not be", deleted "awarded for future medical expenses in malpractice claims" and added "subject to any limitation"; in Subsection H, after "personal liability is limited to", deleted "two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000)" and added "two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000)", after "in excess of", deleted "two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000)" and added "two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000)", after "paid from the", deleted "patient’s compensation", after "fund", added "except", and after "provided in", deleted "Section 41-5-25 NMSA 1978" and added "Subsection I of this section"; and deleted former Subsection E and added Subsections I and J.

The constitutional right to trial by jury applies in cases brought under the Medical Malpractice Act. — Because causes of action brought under the Medical Malpractice Act (MMA), NMSA 1978, §§ 41-5-1 to -29, can be more generally described as causes of action in common-law medical negligence, and claims of common-law medical negligence were triable to a jury at the time the New Mexico Constitution was adopted and took effect, the constitutional right to trial by jury attaches to causes of action brought under the MMA. Siebert v. Okun, 2021-NMSC-016, overruling in part Salopek v. Friedman, 2013-NMCA-087, 308 P.3d 139.

The Medical Malpractice Act’s nonmedical, nonpunitive damages cap does not invade the province of the jury. — The MMA nonmedical, nonpunitive damages cap gives legal consequence to the jury’s finding on damages and does not violate a plaintiff’s right to a jury trial under NM Const., Art. II, Sec. 12, because the right to trial by jury is satisfied when evidence is presented to a jury, which then deliberates and returns a verdict based on its factual findings. The legal consequence of that verdict is a matter of law, which the legislature has the authority to shape. Siebert v. Okun, 2021-NMSC-016, overruling in part Salopek v. Friedman, 2013-NMCA-087, 308 P.3d 139.

Where plaintiff successfully sued defendants for medical malpractice under the Medical Malpractice Act (MMA), NMSA 1978, §§ 41-5-1 to -29, and where, following the return of the jury’s verdict, defendants moved to reduce the jury award of $2,600,000 to conform with the $600,000 cap on all nonmedical and nonpunitive damages in MMA actions, and where the district court denied defendants’ motion, concluding that the MMA nonmedical, nonpunitive damages cap infringed the state constitutional right to a trial by jury, the district court erred in denying defendants’ motion, because the MMA nonmedical, nonpunitive damages cap merely gives legal consequence to the jury’s finding on damages and does not violate a plaintiff’s right to a jury trial under NM Const., Art. II, Sec. 12. Siebert v. Okun, 2021-NMSC-016, overruling in part Salopek v. Friedman, 2013-NMCA-087, 308 P.3d 139.

Cap on medical malpractice damages is constitutional. — The cap on medical malpractice damages does not violate the right to trial by jury under Article II, Section 12 of the New Mexico Constitution, the separation of powers clause in Article III, Section 1 of the New Mexico Constitution, the equal protection clause of the United States Constitution, or the due process clause of the United States Constitution. Salopek v. Friedman, 2013-NMCA-087.

Pre- and post-judgment interest are recoverable on medical malpractice judgments. — The availability of pre- and post-judgment interest on medical malpractice judgments as one type of tort judgment, pursuant to 56-8-4 NMSA 1978, is in harmony with the Medical Malpractice Act (MMA), because nothing in the plain language of the MMA disallows awards of interest or requires interest to be calculated in a different fashion. Siebert v. Okun, M.D., 2024-NMCA-084.

Interest on medical malpractice judgments in excess of the statutory cap must be paid by the patient's compensation fund. — Where plaintiff sued defendants for medical malpractice, and where a jury awarded plaintiff an amount above the statutory cap on nonmedical and nonpunitive damages imposed by the Medical Malpractice Act (MMA), $200,000 of which would be paid by defendants pursuant to the cap on provider liability in 41-5-6(D) NMSA 1978 and the remainder of which would be paid by the patient's compensation fund, the district court erred by requiring defendants to pay interest on the entire amount of the judgment. The patient's compensation fund must pay the interest on the amount of damages in excess of the provider liability cap because liability for interest must be allocated in accordance with the MMA's allocation of liability for damages. Liability for interest on medical malpractice judgments must be allocated consistent with the method of allocating liability for damages that the legislature chose when it enacted the MMA. Siebert v. Okun, M.D., 2024-NMCA-084.

Limits of recovery. — This section is not arbitrary and capricious and is rationally related to legislative goal of ensuring a source of recovery for victims of medical malpractice and curbing runaway medical costs, relying in part on Trujillo v. City of Albuquerque, 1998-NMSC-031, 125 N.M. 721, 965 P.2d 305; Fed. Express Corp. v. United States, 228 F. Supp 2d 1267 (D.N.M. 2002).

County and municipal officials exceeded their authority by enacting abortion-related ordinances preempted by state law. — Where several counties and municipalities (respondents) enacted local ordinances prohibiting the mailing or receipt of any abortion-related instrumentality and creating licensing schemes exclusive to abortion clinics and providers, and where the state of New Mexico sought a writ of mandamus and stay of respondents' enforcement of the ordinances and to invalidate the ordinances as preempted by state law, the writ of mandamus was granted because the ordinances plainly conflicted with the provisions of the Medical Malpractice Act, a comprehensive statute, which sets malpractice insurance requirements and limitations on liability for all health care providers in the state. State ex rel. Torrez v. Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs for Lea Cnty., 2025-NMSC-011.

Federal hospital. — Although not a "qualified health care provider" under 41-5-5 NMSA 1978, the liability of a federal hospital, operating in New Mexico, is subject to the $600,000 cap in Subsection A, but not the $200,000 cap in Subsection D, which assumes that the amount of damages in excess of $ 200,000 would be paid by the compensation fund into which the federal government did not contribute. Haceesa v. United States, 309 F.3d 722 (10th Cir. 2002).

Applicability. — Where it was held that tribal law controlled in a malpractice action against the United States, the New Mexico medical malpractice cap did not apply. Cheromiah v. United States, 55 F. Supp. 2d 1295 (D.N.M. 1999).

Law reviews. — For article, "Medical Malpractice Legislation in New Mexico," see 7 N.M.L. Rev. 5 (1976-77).

Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — 22 Am. Jur. 2d Damages §§ 288, 289; 61 Am. Jur. 2d Physicians, Surgeons, and Other Healers §§ 367 to 371.

Contributory negligence or assumption of risk as defense in action against physician or surgeon for malpractice, 50 A.L.R.2d 1043.

Liability of chiropodist, 80 A.L.R.2d 1278.

Validity and construction of state statutory provisions relating to limitations on amount of recovery in medical malpractice claim and submission of such claim to pretrial panel, 80 A.L.R.3d 583, 26 A.L.R.5th 245.

Recovery, measure and element of damages, in action against dentist for breach of contract to achieve particular result or cure, 11 A.L.R.4th 748.

Validity of statute establishing contingent fee scale for attorneys representing parties in medical malpractice actions, 12 A.L.R.4th 23.

Validity of state statute providing for periodic payment of future damages in medical malpractice action, 41 A.L.R.4th 275.

Future disease or condition, or anxiety relating thereto, as element of recovery, 50 A.L.R.4th 13.

Recovery in death action for failure to diagnose incurable disease which caused death, 64 A.L.R.4th 1232.

Medical malpractice: measure and elements of damages in actions based on loss of chance, 81 A.L.R.4th 485.

What nonpatient claims against doctors, hospitals, or similar health care providers are not subject to statutes specifically governing actions and damages for medical malpractice, 88 A.L.R.4th 358.

Liability of hospital, physician, or other medical personnel for death or injury to mother or child caused by improper diagnosis and treatment of mother relating to and during pregnancy, 7 A.L.R.5th 1.

Validity, construction, and application of state statutory provisions limiting amount of recovery in medical malpractice claims, 26 A.L.R.5th 245.

Liability of hospital or medical practitioner under doctrine of strict liability in tort, or breach of warranty, for harm caused by drug, medical instrument, or similar device used in treating patient, 65 A.L.R.5th 357.

70 C.J.S. Physicians and Surgeons §§ 124, 127.