A. In a criminal proceeding, the presiding officer may allow a child witness to testify by an alternative method in the following situations:

1. (1) the child may testify otherwise than in an open forum in the presence and full view of the finder of fact upon a showing that the child witness may be unable to testify without suffering unreasonable and unnecessary mental or emotional harm; and

2. (2) the child may testify other than face-to-face with the defendant if the presiding officer makes specific findings that the child witness would be unable to testify face-to-face with the defendant without suffering unreasonable and unnecessary mental or emotional harm.

   B. In a noncriminal proceeding, the presiding officer may allow a child witness to testify by an alternative method if the presiding officer finds that allowing the child to testify by an alternative method is necessary to serve the best interests of the child or enable the child to communicate with the finder of fact. In making this finding, the presiding officer shall consider:

3. (1) the nature of the proceeding;
4. (2) the age and maturity of the child;
5. (3) the relationship of the child to the parties in the proceeding;
6. (4) the nature and degree of mental or emotional harm that the child may suffer in testifying; and
7. (5) any other relevant factor.

History: Laws 2011, ch. 98, § 5.

ANNOTATIONS

Effective dates. — Laws 2011, ch. 98, § 11 made the Uniform Child Witness Protective Measures Act effective July 1, 2012.

Severability. — Laws 2011, ch. 98, § 10 provided that if any part or application of the Uniform Child Witness Protective Measures Act was held invalid, the remainder or its application to other situations or persons shall not be affected.