N.M. Stat. Ann. § 35-14-1
B. The governing body of a municipality that is not governed by home rule, territorial or special charter and having a population fewer than ten thousand persons in the most recent federal decennial census, where the municipal court is located twenty-five or fewer miles from the nearest magistrate court, may by resolution express its intent to designate the magistrate court of the county in which the municipality is located as the court having jurisdiction over municipal ordinances. Within fifteen days from the adoption of a resolution pursuant to this section, the governing body of the municipality shall create a "municipal ordinance jurisdiction advisory committee". The municipal ordinance jurisdiction advisory committee shall be composed of the following members, who shall be residents of the municipality:
C. A municipal ordinance jurisdiction advisory committee shall:
E. Within five days after the effective date of an ordinance adopted pursuant to Subsection D of this section, the governing body of the municipality shall:
F. A magistrate court designated pursuant to Subsection D of this section shall, with respect to ordinances of the municipality:
G. Any municipality that has passed an ordinance designating the magistrate court of the county in which the municipality is located as the court having jurisdiction over municipal ordinances may re-establish the municipal court as the court having jurisdiction over municipal ordinances through the following procedures:
(2) following receipt of a petition signed by at least twenty percent of the registered voters who voted in the last municipal election for the office of mayor:
History: 1953 Comp., § 37-1-1, enacted by Laws 1961, ch. 208, § 1; 1967, ch. 215, § 1; 1968, ch. 62, § 152; 1979, ch. 346, § 12; 1984, ch. 30, § 3; 1985, ch. 128, § 2; 1993, ch. 143, § 1; 2019, ch. 246, § 1; 2023, ch. 184, § 17.
Cross references. — For classification of counties, see 4-44-1 and 4-44-3 NMSA 1978.
For Rules of Procedure for the Municipal Courts, see Rule 8-101 NMRA et seq.
The 2023 amendment, effective July 1, 2024, removed provisions related to the remittance of certain fees that are no longer collected, and provided that after the effective date of this section, no court shall assess post-adjudication fees previously authorized by statute; deleted Paragraphs F(3) and F(4); and added Subsection H.
The 2019 amendment, effective June 14, 2019, revised procedures regarding the designation by a municipality of the magistrate court of the county in which the municipality is located as the court having jurisdiction over municipal ordinances, provided procedures to re-establish the municipal court as the court having jurisdiction over municipal ordinances, and specified certain court-imposed fees to be remitted to the state; in Subsection A, after "pursuant to Subsection" deleted "B" and added "D"; added new Subsections B through D and redesignated former Subsections B and C as Subsection E and F, respectively; in Subsection E, in the introductory paragraph, deleted "The governing body of a municipality with a population of one thousand five hundred persons or less in the last federal decennial census may designate the magistrate court of the county in which the municipality is located as the court having jurisdiction over municipal ordinances. The designation shall be by adopted ordinance which shall not be effective until the expiration of the term of any incumbent municipal judge.", and after "date of an ordinance", added "adopted pursuant to Subsection D of this section"; in Subsection F, in the introductory clause, after "Subsection", deleted "B" and added "D", in Paragraph F(3), after "to the state", deleted "all funds" and added "the court automation and judicial education fees", after "collected", added "pursuant to Subsection B of Section 35-14-11 NMSA 1978", and added Paragraph F(4); and added Subsection G.
The 1993 amendment, effective June 18, 1993, substituted "one thousand five hundred" for "five hundred" near the beginning of Subsection B.
When judgment may be vacated. — A police magistrate court does not have authority to vacate a judgment rendered by it in the course of its jurisdiction, absent any question of fraud practiced on said court. 1958 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 58-03 (rendered under former law).
Validity of ordinance regulating officeholding. — A municipal ordinance which provides that a municipal judge shall not hold any other state, county, city or precinct office or position is valid. 1962 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 62-106 (rendered under former law).
Offices not incompatible. — The office of a municipal magistrate is not incompatible with that of the city clerk under 3-12-4 NMSA 1978. There is no inconsistency of function, no subordination and no interference as long as the clerk is not charged with enforcing any municipal ordinance. If either office is full time, however, a physical incompatibility exists. 1967 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 67-74.
Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — 20 Am. Jur. 2d Courts § 12.
21 C.J.S. Courts § 93 et seq.