N.M. Stat. Ann. § 32A-1-9
History: 1978 Comp., § 32A-1-9, enacted by Laws 1993, ch. 77, § 18; 1999, ch. 196, § 1; 2005, ch. 189, § 5; 2020, ch. 52, § 1.
The 2020 amendment, effective May 20, 2020, revised certain venue and transfer of venue provisions for proceedings under the Fostering Connections Act; in Subsection A, after "where the child resides", added "or in the case of an eligible adult pursuant to the Fostering Connections Act, where the eligible adult resides", and added "A transfer may be made if the residence of the child or eligible adult changes or for other good cause"; deleted former Subsections B and C and redesignated former Subsection D as Subsection B; and deleted former Subsection D.
The 2005 amendment, effective June 17, 2005, changed "custodian" to "guardian" in Subsection D.
The 1999 amendment, effective July 1, 1999, inserted "or after" in the second sentence of Subsection C, in Subsection D, inserted "Indian" preceding "child's parents" in the first sentence, and "Indian" preceding "child or" in the third sentence.
Decisions under prior law. — In light of the similarity of the provisions, annotations decided under former Section 32-1-13 NMSA 1978 have been included in the annotations to this section.
Transfer barred. — Where a transfer of jurisdiction to tribal court was raised for the first time on appeal, application of the statute was not allowed because the issue was not properly preserved. State ex rel. Children, Youth & Families Dep't v. Andrea M., 2000-NMCA-079, 129 N.M. 512, 10 P.3d 191.
Intent of section. — The legislature intended to create a mechanism which would allow both the children's court and the district court to exercise full subject matter jurisdiction in criminal matters. State v. Garcia, 1979-NMSC-049, 93 N.M. 51, 596 P.2d 264.
District court was required to send matter to children's court if defendant was not adult when the offense charged allegedly was committed. State v. Doe, 1980-NMCA-147, 95 N.M. 88, 619 P.2d 192.
Remand from state district court to children's court. — On habeas corpus petitions by state prisoners, the federal courts are concerned only with basic constitutional questions, and whether a juvenile under New Mexico law is entitled to a remand from the state district court to the juvenile (now children's) court because of defects in the waiver of jurisdiction presents a procedural question ordinarily to be determined by the New Mexico courts. Salazar v. Rodriguez, 371 F.2d 726 (10th Cir. 1967).
Traffic offenses not deemed delinquent acts. — Municipal and magistrate courts can exercise jurisdiction over children for traffic offenses which are not designated delinquent acts under the Children's Code. 1972 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 72-34.
Extradition of juveniles from another state. 1973 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 73-14 (rendered under prior law).
Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — Jurisdiction of another court over child as affected by assumption of jurisdiction by juvenile court, 11 A.L.R. 147, 78 A.L.R. 317, 146 A.L.R. 1153.
Authority of court to order juvenile delinquent incarcerated in adult penal institution, 95 A.L.R.3d 568.