N.M. Stat. Ann. § 32A-1-7
E. Unless a child's circumstances render the following duties and responsibilities unreasonable, a guardian ad litem shall:
History: 1978 Comp., § 32A-1-7, enacted by Laws 1993, ch. 77, § 16; 1995, ch. 206, § 4; 2005, ch. 189, § 3.
The 2005 amendment, effective June 17, 2005, provided in Subsection A that a guardian ad litem shall represent a child in a proceeding for which the guardian has been appointed and in subsequent appeals; provided in Subsection B that unless excused by a court, a guardian ad litem shall continue the representation in subsequent appeals; provided in Subsection D that a guardian ad litem shall convey the child's declared position to the court at every hearing; provided in Subsection E that unless a child's circumstances render the prescribed duties and responsibilities unreasonable, the guardian ad litem shall perform the prescribed duties and responsibilities in Subsection E; added Subsection H to provide that a guardian ad litem shall receive documents required to be provided or served on a party and may file motions and pleadings and take actions consistent with the guardian's powers and duties; and added Subsection I to provide that a guardian ad litem shall not serve concurrently as a child's delinquency attorney and guardian ad litem.
The 1995 amendment, effective July 1, 1995, added "with respect to matters arising pursuant to the provisions of the Children's Code" in Subsection A; added Subsections C and F and redesignated the remaining subsections accordingly; in Subsection E, inserted "or any other cause of action" following "fee basis" and added the last sentence; and made minor stylistic changes throughout the section.
Guardian ad litem's dual role. — A guardian ad litem has the dual role of representing the child's best interests, while also presenting the child's position to the court when reasonable and appropriate, even if the child's position conflicts with what the guardian ad litem thinks should be done. State ex rel. Children, Youth & Families Dep't v. Esperanza M., 1998-NMCA-039, 124 N.M. 735, 955 P.2d 204; State ex rel. Children, Youth & Families Dep't (In re Candice Y.), 2000-NMCA-035, 128 N.M. 813, 999 P.2d 1045, cert. denied, 129 N.M. 207, 4 P.3d 35.
Attorney's dual relationship with child – as guardian ad litem during abuse and neglect proceedings, and then as her defense attorney during delinquency proceedings – has potential to become actual, active conflict of interest, and requires, when acting as defense attorney, that counsel adopt child's viewpoint and zealously represent child's wishes, whether or not counsel necessarily agrees that those wishes represent child's best interests State v. Joanna V., 2004-NMSC-024, 136 N.M. 40, 94 P.3d 783.
Ex parte conduct rule inapplicable to guardians ad litem. — Rule 16-402 NMRA of the rules of professional conduct does not prohibit guardians ad litem from communicating ex parte with department of children, youth and families social workers; although attorneys, guardians ad litem do not have typical attorney-client relationships with children, and are therefore not bound by that rule. State ex rel. Children, Youth & Families Dep't v. George F., 1998-NMCA-119, 125 N.M. 597, 964 P.2d 158, cert. denied, 125 N.M. 654, 964 P.2d 818.