N.M. Stat. Ann. § 32A-1-4
N. "Indian" means, whether an adult or child, a person who is:
O. "Indian child" means an Indian person, or a person whom there is reason to know is an Indian person, under eighteen years of age, who is neither:
P. "Indian child's tribe" means:
Q. "Indian custodian" means an Indian who, pursuant to tribal law or custom or pursuant to state law:
W. "permanency plan" means a determination by the court that the child's interest will be served best by:
BB. "relative" means a person related to another person:
CC. "reservation" means:
History: 1978 Comp., § 32A-1-4, enacted by Laws 1993, ch. 77, § 13; 1995, ch. 206, § 2; 1999, ch. 77, § 2; 2003, ch. 225, § 1; 2005, ch. 189, § 1; 2009, ch. 239, § 7; 2016, ch. 60, § 1; 2019, ch. 190, § 1; 2022, ch. 41, § 44; 2023, ch. 90, § 2; 2025, ch. 156, § 3.
Cross references. — For the Children's Court Rules, see 10-101 NMRA et seq.
For the federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978, see 25 U.S.C. § 1901.
The 2025 amendment, effective June 20, 2025, revised the definition of the term "plan of safe care" as used in the Children's Code; in Subsection Y, after "plan of" added "safe", added "written" preceding the second occurrence of "plan", added "immediate and ongoing" preceding "safety and well-being", after "newborn" added "or to provide perinatal support to a pregnant person with substance use disorder", after "guardians" deleted "family members" and added "custodians" and replaced "caregivers" with "caretakers".
The 2023 amendment, effective July 1, 2023, revised the definition of "guardian"; and in Subsection L, after "Indian tribal authority", deleted "or a person authorized to care for the child by a parental power of attorney as permitted by law".
The 2022 amendment, effective July 1, 2022, defined "active efforts", "federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978", "Indian", "Indian custodian", "member" or "membership", "reservation", and "secretary", and revised the definitions of "Indian child", "Indian tribe", "parent" or "parents", "relative", and "tribal court", as used in the Children's Code; added a new Subsection A and redesignated former Subsections A through H as Subsections B through I, respectively; added a new Subsection J and redesignated former Subsections I through K as Subsections K through M, respectively; added a new Subsection N and redesignated former Subsections L and M as Subsections O and P, respectively; in Subsection O, after "means an", deleted "unmarried person who is" and added "Indian person, or a person whom there is reason to know is an Indian person under eighteen years of age, who is neither", and added Paragraphs O(1) and O(2); added a new Subsection Q and redesignated former Subsections N through P as Subsections R through T, respectively; in Subsection R, after "means", deleted "federally recognized Indian tribe, community or group pursuant to 25 U.S.C. Section 1903(1)" and added "an Indian nation, tribe, pueblo or other band, organized group or community of Indians recognized as eligible for the services provided to Indians, including an Alaska native village as defined in 43 U.S.C. Section 1602(c) or a regional corporation as defined in 43 U.S.C. Section 1606. For the purposes of notification to and communication with a tribe as required in the Indian Family Protection Act, 'Indian tribe' also includes those tribal officials and staff who are responsible for child welfare and social services matters"; added a new Subsection U and redesignated former Subsections Q through W as Subsections V through BB, respectively; in Subsection V, after "custody of the child", added "or a person who has lawfully adopted an Indian child pursuant to state law or tribal law or tribal custom"; in Subsection BB, added Paragraph BB(2); added Subsection CC and redesignated former Subsection X as Subsection DD; added Subsection EE and redesignated former Subsections Y through AA as Subsections FF through HH, respectively; and in Subsection FF, deleted former Paragraphs (1) and (2) and added "a court with jurisdiction over child custody proceedings that is either a court of Indian offenses, a court established and operated under the law or custom of an Indian tribe or any other administrative body that is vested by an Indian tribe with authority over child custody proceedings".
The 2019 amendment, effective June 14, 2019, defined "plan of care" as used in the Children's Code; and added a new Subsection T and redesignated former Subsections T through Z as Subsections U through AA, respectively.
The 2016 amendment, effective July 1, 2016, defined "council" and "relative" as used in the Children’s Code; added new Subsection C and redesignated former Subsections C through T as Subsections D through U, respectively; in Subsection E, after "special advocate", deleted "or ‘CASA’", after "person appointed", deleted "as a CASA", and after "Court Rules", deleted "who assists" and added "to assist"; in Subsection K, after "the child in a", deleted "court proceeding" and added "case", and after "party to the", deleted "proceeding" and added "case"; and added a new Subsection V and redesignated the succeeding subsections accordingly.
The 2009 amendment, effective July 1, 2009, added Subsection G.
The 2005 amendment, effective June 17, 2005, defined "custodian" in Subsection E to mean an adult with whom a child lives who is not a parent or guardian of the child; defined "guardian" in Subsection H to mean a person appointed as a guardian by a court, Indian tribal authority or a person with parental power of attorney; deleted the definition of "guardianship" in former Subsection I; added the definition of "Indian tribe" in Subsection L; provided in Subsection N that "legal custody" includes a legal status created by operation of statute and includes the right and duty to provide personal care of a child; deleted from the former provisions in Subsection N that the rights and duties of legal custody were subject to the rights of the guardian of the child and that required a person granted legal custody to exercise the custodial rights personally; deleted the former provision in Subsection O that a parent retains the duties of guardianship and legal custody of a child; defined "permanency plan" in Subsection P to include a determination that a child's interest will be served best by a reunification or placement with a person who will be the child's permanent guardian; added the definition of "protective supervision" in Subsection S; and added the definition of "reunification" in Subsection T.
The 2003 amendment, effective July 1, 2003, substituted "a person" for "an individual" in Subsections A and B; deleted "and Forms" following "Children's Court Rules" in Subsection D; substituted "a person" for "any persons" following "residential facility or" in Subsection E; substituted "A person" for "An individual" preceding "granted legal custody" in Subsection N; substituted "with the child placed in the home of a fit and willing relative" for "until the child reaches the age of majority, unless the child is emancipated, pursuant to the Emancipation of Minors Act" in Paragraph P(4); deleted "that meets the department's definition of long-term foster care" at the end of Paragraph P(5).
The 1999 amendment, effective July 1, 1999, deleted "but is not necessarily limited in either number or kind to" at the end of Subsection I; in Subsection O, inserted the language beginning "if the biological" to the end of the first sentence and added the second sentence; and added Subsections P and R, and redesignated the subsequent subsections accordingly.
The 1995 amendment, effective July 1, 1995, in Subsection G, inserted "or certified" following "licensed"; in Subsection N, inserted "department" preceding "or agency" and the language beginning "the right to" and ending "Disabilities Act;"; in Subsection O, substituted "biological" for "natural"; added Subsections Q and R; and redesignated former Subsection Q as Subsection S.
Decisions under prior law. — In light of the similarity of the provisions, annotations decided under former Section 32-1-3 NMSA 1978 have been included in the annotations to this section.
Stepfather as "custodian". — A stepfather meets the definition of "custodian" for purposes of the court's subject matter jurisdiction over him in a proceeding on a petition alleging abuse or neglect of a child. State ex rel. Children, Youth & Families Dep't (In re Candice Y.), 2000-NMCA-035, 128 N.M. 813, 999 P.2d 1045, cert. denied, 129 N.M. 207, 4 P.3d 35.
Human services department [health care authority department] not "person". — State health and social services (now human services) department was not a "person" within the meaning of the Children's Code. Thus, the department need not be made a party to nor was its presence required in any action filed pursuant to the Children's Code where it may be ordered to assume certain responsibilities pursuant to the Children's Code. In re Doe, 1975-NMCA-152, 88 N.M. 632, 545 P.2d 491.
Ex parte conduct rule inapplicable to guardians ad litem. — Rule 16-402 NMRA of the Rules of Professional Conduct does not prohibit guardians ad litem from communicating ex parte with department of children, youth and families social workers; although attorneys, guardians ad litem do not have typical attorney-client relationships with children, and are therefore not bound by that rule. State ex rel. Children, Youth & Families Dep't v. George F., 1998-NMCA-119, 125 N.M. 597, 964 P.2d 158, cert. denied, 125 N.M. 654, 964 P.2d 818.
Legal custody provides the right to determine placement of children. — Absent an abuse of its discretion, when the children, youth and families department (department) has legal custody of a child, the department alone is permitted to determine where and with whom the child will be placed. State ex rel. Children, Youth & Families Dep’t v. Jerry K., 2015-NMCA-047, cert. denied, 2015-NMCERT-004.
Where father pleaded no contest to the allegation that his children were neglected as a result of father’s inability to discharge his responsibilities to and for them because of incarceration, and where the district court ordered the children into the legal custody of the children, youth and families department (department), the department had the sole discretionary authority, absent an abuse of discretion, to decide with whom the children would be placed, despite father’s own preferences for placement of the children. State ex rel. Children, Youth & Families Dep’t v. Jerry K., 2015-NMCA-047, cert. denied, 2015-NMCERT-004.
"Legal custody" continues until terminated by appropriate authority. — A parent has a legal right to the custody of his child unless that right had been terminated, however temporarily, by appropriate authority. State v. Sanders, 1981-NMCA-053, 96 N.M. 138, 628 P.2d 1134.
A parent's legal right to custody of a child does not end until entry of, and the giving of notice of, a judgment in compliance with Rule 62(a), N.M.R. Child. Ct. (now 10-352 NMRA), requiring a signed written judgment and disposition. State v. Sanders, 1981-NMCA-053, 96 N.M. 138, 628 P.2d 1134.
Age references are to years of age, not mental age. — The numerous references to age in the Children's Code are references to years of age, not mental age. State v. Doe, 1982-NMCA-028, 97 N.M. 598, 642 P.2d 201, cert denied, 98 N.M. 50, 644 P.2d 1039.
Law reviews. — For comment, "Navajo Grandparents - ‘Parent’ or ‘Stranger’ - A Child Custody Determination," see 9 N.M.L. Rev. 187 (1978-79).
For article, "The New Mexico Children's Code: Some Remaining Problems," see 10 N.M.L. Rev. 341 (1980).
For article, "Child Welfare Under the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978: A New Mexico Focus," see 10 N.M.L. Rev. 413 (1980).