N.M. Stat. Ann. § 31-15-7
A. The chief is responsible to the commission for the operation of the department. It is the chief's duty to manage all operations of the department and to:
(3) represent and advocate for the department and its clients.
B. To perform the chief's duties, the chief has every power implied as necessary for that purpose, those powers expressly enumerated in the Public Defender Act or other laws and full power and authority to:
History: 1953 Comp., § 41-22A-7, enacted by Laws 1973, ch. 156, § 7; 1977, ch. 257, § 60; 1985, ch. 32, § 3; 1987, ch. 20, § 1; 2001, ch. 34, § 1; 2013, ch. 195, § 11; 2014, ch. 78, § 3.
Cross references. — For defense of indigents, see 31-16-1 to 31-16-10 NMSA 1978.
The 2014 amendment, effective May 21, 2014, authorized the public defender to supervise department employees under personnel policies adopted by the public defender commission; and in Subsection B, Paragraph (1), after "department", deleted "subject to the Personnel Act".
The 2013 amendment, June 14, 2013, required the chief public defender to represent and advocate for the public defender department and its clients; in Subsection A, in the first sentence of the introductory paragraph, after "responsible to the", deleted "governor" and added "commission"; added Paragraph (3) of Subsection A; in Paragraph (9) of Subsection B, after "annual report", added "and budget", after "recommendations to the", deleted "governor, secretary of corrections" and added "commission", after "commission, and", added "upon approval by the commission, to the", and after "to the legislature", added "and the governor".
The 2001 amendment, effective July 1, 2001, inserted Paragraph B(15), which gives the chief the power to certify certain contracts and expenditures for litigation expenses.
The 1987 amendment, effective June 19, 1987, in Subsection B(9), substituted "corrections and" for "the criminal justice department and the" and added Subsections B(12) through (14).
The 1985 amendment deleted former Subsection A(3), relating to the chief's duty to advise the public defender board on matters relating to the administration of the department.
Constitutionality of flat-fee arrangements for indigent defense contract counsel. — Where the New Mexico legislature, in its 2015 general appropriation to the law office of the public defender (LOPD), specifically provided that the appropriations to the public defender department shall not be used to pay hourly reimbursement rates to contract attorneys, the district court erred in entering an order requiring the LOPD to pay contract counsel hourly rates and the state to provide additional funding, nullifying the legislature’s prohibition of the payment of hourly rates to indigent defense contract counsel as violative of the federal and state constitutions, based on its conclusion that the flat-fee rates paid to contract counsel by the LOPD contravene the constitutional guarantee of effective assistance of counsel; an indigent criminal defendant who is represented by contract counsel who is compensated under a flat-fee arrangement does not necessarily receive ineffective assistance of counsel. Kerr v. Parsons, 2016-NMSC-028.