N.M. Stat. Ann. § 30-31-27.1
A. A person who, in good faith, seeks medical assistance for someone experiencing an alcohol- or drug-related overdose shall not be arrested, charged, prosecuted or otherwise penalized, nor shall the property of the person be subject to civil forfeiture, for violating any of the following if the evidence for the alleged violation was obtained as a result of the need for seeking medical assistance:
B. A person who experiences an alcohol- or drug-related overdose and is in need of medical assistance shall not be arrested, charged, prosecuted or otherwise penalized, nor shall the property of the person be subject to civil forfeiture, for violating any of the following if the evidence for the alleged violation was obtained as a result of the overdose and the need for seeking medical assistance:
D. For the purposes of this section, "seeking medical assistance" means:
History: Laws 2007, ch. 260, § 1; 2019, ch. 211, § 3.
The 2019 amendment, effective July 1, 2019, expanded limited immunity for those who seek medical assistance for someone experiencing a drug-related overdose to include alcohol overdose, and provided an exemption from civil forfeiture for the property of a person who, in good faith, seeks medical assistance for someone experiencing an alcohol- or drug-related overdose, and provided similar protections for the person who is experiencing an overdose who seeks medical assistance; in Subsection A, after "experiencing", deleted "a" and added "an alcohol- or", after "shall not be", added "arrested", after "prosecuted", added "or otherwise be penalized, nor shall the property of the person be subject to civil forfeiture", and after "for", deleted "possession of a controlled substance" and added "violating any of the following if the evidence for the alleged violation was obtained as a result of the need for seeking medical assistance", in Paragraph A(1), after "Section 30-31-23", added "NMSA 1978 or Subsection A of Section 30-31-25.1", deleted "if the evidence for the charge of possession of a controlled substance was gained as a result of the seeking of medical assistance", and added Paragraphs A(2) and A(3); in Subsection B, after "experiences", deleted "a" and added "an alcohol- or", after "shall not be", added "arrested", after "prosecuted", added "or otherwise penalized, nor shall the property of the person be subject to civil forfeiture", after "for", deleted "possession of a controlled substance pursuant to" and added "violating any of the following if the evidence for the alleged violation was obtained as a result of the overdose and the need for seeking medical assistance", in Paragraph B(1), after "Section 30-31-23", added "NMSA 1978 or Subsection A of Section 30-31-25.1", deleted "if the evidence for the charge of possession of a controlled substance was gained as a result of the overdose and the need for medical assistance", and added Paragraphs B(2) and B(3); in Subsection C, after "experiencing", deleted "a" and added "an alcohol- or", after "Controlled Substances Act", added "for which immunity is not provided pursuant to this section."; and added Subsection D.
Action to revoke probation was barred. — Where defendant committed multiple offenses and was sentenced to multiple term-of-years sentences to be served consecutively, and where the district court suspended defendant's sentence and placed him on unsupervised probation for a period of five years, and where several years after defendant was placed on unsupervised probation, police officers, while responding to a report of a possible overdose, found defendant unresponsive and lying on the floor of a hotel room where officers also found a firearm and substances that appeared to be a combination of methamphetamine and fentanyl, and where the state filed a motion to revoke defendant's probation, the district court erred in revoking defendant's probation on the grounds that defendant possessed a firearm and for failing to report as required by his probation, because the plain language of 30-31-27.1(B)(3) NMSA 1978 clearly and unambiguously states that person who overdoses shall not be penalized for probation or parole violations so long as the evidence for the alleged probation or parole violation arose from both the overdose and the need to seek medical assistance, and the two probation violations supporting the district court's revocation of defendant's probation were discovered as a result of defendant's overdose and the need to seek medical assistance. State v. Herrera, 2024-NMCA-063.