N.M. Stat. Ann. § 3-33-24
A. To pay all or any part of the cost of the improvement, including those items set out in Subsection C of Section 3-33-11 NMSA 1978, the governing body may proceed pursuant to the provisions of Section 3-33-14.1 NMSA 1978 or may issue in the name of the municipality bonds in such form as the governing body may determine or assignable certificates in an amount not exceeding the total cost of the improvement and maturing not more than twenty years from the date of issuance. If the bonds or assignable certificates recite that:
B. The assignable certificates shall:
C. The bonds shall:
D. The bonds may be issued to the contractor in payment for the construction of the improvement or may be issued and sold:
History: 1953 Comp., § 14-32-17, enacted by Laws 1965, ch. 300; 1970, ch. 51, § 1; 1979, ch. 108, § 2; 1983, ch. 265, § 8; 1991, ch. 199, § 15; 2001, ch. 312, § 8.
Cross references. — For refunding improvement bonds, see 3-33-39 NMSA 1978 et seq.
For destruction of documentary evidence of extinguished public debt, see 6-10-62 NMSA 1978.
The 2001 amendment, effective June 15, 2001, inserted the reference to 3-33-14.1 NMSA 1978, in Subsection A.
The 1991 amendment, effective April 4, 1991, in Subsection A, inserted "including those items set out in Subsection C of Section 3-33-11 NMSA 1978" near the beginning and added "and maturing not more than twenty years from the date of issuance" at the end of the first sentence, inserted "as provided in Section 3-33-22 NMSA 1978 or placing the preliminary lien as provided in Section 3-33-11 NMSA" in Paragraph (1) and inserted "or placing the preliminary lien" in Paragraph (2); and in Subsection C, added Paragraph (2), designated former Paragraphs (2) and (3) as Paragraphs (3) and (4), substituted "project described in Subsection A of Section 3-33-3 NMSA 1978" for "street, alley, curb, gutter or sidewalk project" in the first full sentence in Paragraph (4), and made minor stylistic changes.
Construction of statute. — Statute was remedial in nature and did not impair the obligation of contract, and had application to bonds issued prior to its enactment. City of Albuquerque v. Middle Rio Grande Conservancy Dist., 1941-NMSC-021, 45 N.M. 313, 115 P.2d 66 (1941); Gray v. City of Santa Fe, 15 F. Supp. 1074 (D.N.M. 1936), modified and aff'd, 89 F.2d 406 (10th Cir. 1937).
Validation of bonds previously issued. — Legislature specifically authorized "paving bonds" to be issued by municipalities, and ratified, approved and confirmed, as valid obligations, any bonds theretofore issued by any municipalities for the purpose of paying the costs of such improvement as though the same were issued under the provisions of this section. Hodges v. City of Roswell, 1926-NMSC-016, 31 N.M. 384, 247 P. 310.
Vote of electors required. — Obligation prescribed by applicable statute and certificates that city guarantee payment of deficiency in special assessment fund from the general revenues of the city was not within the constitutional power of the city without a vote of the qualified electors as required by N.M. Const., art. IX, § 12. Purcell v. City of Carlsbad, 126 F.2d 748 (10th Cir. 1942).
Notice of statutory provisions. — All parties, including holders of municipal bonds, are chargeable with notice of the statutes and ordinances governing the issue. The recitals in the bonds are insufficient to give such notice. State ex rel. Ackerman v. City of Carlsbad, 1935-NMSC-053, 39 N.M. 352, 47 P.2d 865.
Certificates were debts. — Town sewer certificates, were debts within provision of constitution. Henning v. Town of Hot Springs, 1939-NMSC-029, 44 N.M. 321, 102 P.2d 25.
Debt must be fixed and certain. — Sewer construction debt must be fixed, definite and certain in amount at time it was incurred. Henning v. Town of Hot Springs, 1939-NMSC-029, 44 N.M. 321, 102 P.2d 25.
Payment of deficiency held void. — The guaranty of a city to pay to the holders of sewer certificates payable out of assessments any deficiency not met by the assessments was void, in view of N.M. Const., art. IX, § 12. City of Santa Fe v. First Nat'l Bank, 1937-NMSC-009, 41 N.M. 130, 65 P.2d 857.
Negotiable coupon bond which provided for interest "from date until payment" authorized payment of interest after maturity. Munro v. City of Albuquerque, 1939-NMSC-043, 43 N.M. 334, 93 P.2d 993.
Limitations on interest. — Where a city issued special paving assessment bonds with coupons calling for 6% interest until maturity, and providing that upon default all should at once become due and should draw 1% per month, the provisions could not be enforced, since interest was limited by law to 8%, and the city could not be compelled to pay more than 8%. Munro v. City of Albuquerque, 1939-NMSC-043, 43 N.M. 334, 93 P.2d 993.
Bonds should not be surrendered and marked "paid and discharged" until all accumulated interest is paid. Munro v. City of Albuquerque, 1939-NMSC-043, 43 N.M. 334, 93 P.2d 993.
Sale of bonds. — Nothing in the provisions of this section would prevent the sale of special improvement bonds below par and interest accrued thereon. Stone v. City of Hobbs, 1950-NMSC-032, 54 N.M. 237, 220 P.2d 704.
Discount on bonds. — Discount on special street improvement bonds must be treated as an incidental expense which may be assessed against the property situated in the improvement district. Stone v. City of Hobbs, 1950-NMSC-032, 54 N.M. 237, 220 P.2d 704.
Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — 64 Am. Jur. 2d Public Securities and Obligations §§ 104, 105; 70A Am. Jur. 2d Special or Local Assessments §§ 223 to 226.
Negotiability of municipal bonds as affected by reference to fund from which they are to be paid, 42 A.L.R. 1027.
64 C.J.S. Municipal Corporations §§ 1893, 1907, 1957.