N.M. Stat. Ann. § 3-2-3
B. No territory within an urbanized territory shall be incorporated as a municipality unless the:
History: 1953 Comp., § 14-2-3, enacted by Laws 1965, ch. 300; Laws 1967, ch. 198, § 1; 1995, ch. 170, § 1; 2019, ch. 6, § 1; 2019, ch. 212, § 179.
2019 Multiple Amendments. — Laws 2019, ch. 6, § 1, effective July 1, 2019, and Laws 2019, ch. 212, § 179, effective April 3, 2019, enacted different amendments to this section that can be reconciled. Pursuant to 12-1-8 NMSA 1978, Laws 2019, ch. 212, § 179 as the last act signed by the governor, is set out above and incorporates both amendments. The amendments enacted by Laws 2019, ch. 6, § 1 and Laws 2019, ch. 212, § 179 are described below. To view the session laws in their entirety, see the 2019 session laws on NMOneSource.com.
The nature of the difference between the amendments is that Laws 2019, ch. 6, § 1, revised the qualifications for a territory to be considered an urbanized territory, and Laws 2019, ch. 212, § 179, removed "registered" preceding "qualified electors".
Laws 2019, ch. 6, § 1, effective July 1, 2019, revised the qualifications for a territory to be considered an urbanized territory; in Subsection A, after "except that territory in a", deleted "class B", after the next occurrence of "county", deleted "with a population between ninety-five thousand and ninety-nine thousand five hundred, based on the 1990 federal decennial census", and after "majority of the registered", deleted "qualified electors" and added "voters".
Laws 2019, ch. 212, § 179, effective April 3, 2019, in Subsection A, removed "registered" preceding "qualified electors".
The 1995 amendment, effective April 5, 1995, added the language in Subsection A beginning "except that territory in a class B county" and ending "qualified electors within the traditional historic community", deleted "shall" preceding "approve" in Paragraph B(1), and added Subsection C.
"Conclusively prove" construed. — Without deciding the necessity of following the procedures set forth in Subsections B(1) and (2), the district court properly found that an association of landowners had not proved conclusively, as required by Subsection B(3), that it could provide services to an urbanized territory proposed to be incorporated sooner than could the city. City of Sunland Park v. Santa Teresa Concerned Citizens Ass'n, 1990-NMSC-050, 110 N.M. 95, 792 P.2d 1138.
"Proposed to be annexed" construed. — Where the provisional government of Santa Teresa (Santa Teresa), a New Mexico non-profit corporation consisting of owners of land in the Santa Teresa area in Doña Ana county, sought to incorporate the area as a municipality, separate from neighboring city of Sunland Park (Sunland Park), the district court erred in affirming the Doña Ana board of county commissioners’ denial of Santa Teresa’s petition to incorporate based on a determination that 3-2-3(B)(3) NMSA 1978 required Santa Teresa to first submit a formal petition asking Sunland Park to annex the subject territory, because 3-2-3(B)(3) NMSA 1978 does not require residents of a territory to first formally petition the existing municipality to annex the territory before they can file a petition to incorporate as a municipality; such residents may file an incorporation petition pursuant to 3-2-1 NMSA 1978 and 3-2-5 NMSA 1978 if the municipality informally proposes to consider or otherwise expresses an interest in annexing the territory, short of actually initiating formal annexation proceedings. Provisional Gov’t of Santa Teresa v. Doña Ana Cnty. Bd. of Comm’rs, 2018-NMCA-070, cert. granted.