N.M. Stat. Ann. § 28-1-2
As used in the Human Rights Act:
J. "political subdivision" means any:
W. "undue hardship" means an accommodation requiring significant difficulty or expense when considered in light of the following factors:
History: 1953 Comp., § 4-33-2, enacted by Laws 1969, ch. 196, § 2; 1973, ch. 155, § 1; 1978 Comp., 28-1-2; 1983, ch. 241, § 1; 1987, ch. 76, § 1; 1987, ch. 342, § 16; 1993, ch. 268, § 1; 2003, ch. 383, § 1; 2007, ch. 200, § 17; 2020, ch. 49, § 1; 2021, ch. 19, § 3; 2021, ch. 37, § 3; 2023, ch. 29, § 1; 2024, ch. 21, § 4.
The 2024 amendment, effective May 15, 2024, defined "military status"; and added Subsection EE.
The 2023 amendment, effective June 16, 2023, revised the definition of "public accommodation," rewrote the definitions of "sexual orientation" and "gender identity," and defined "public contractor," "political subdivision," "sex," "gender," "state," "governmental entity," "public body," and "services"; in Subsection H, after "means", added "any governmental entity"; added new Subsections I and J and redesignated former Subsections I through O as Subsections K through Q, respectively; in Subsection O, substituted "handicap" with "disability" throughout the subsection, and after "also considered to", deleted "be physically or mentally handicapped" and added "have a mental or physical disability"; deleted former Subsections P and Q; added new Subsections R through U and redesignated former Subsections R through V as Subsections V through Z, respectively; and added Subsections AA through DD.
The 2021 amendment, effective July 1, 2021, defined "cultural or religious headdresses", "protective hairstyles", and "race" as used in the Human Rights Act; added new Subsections T through V.
The 2020 amendment, effective May 20, 2020, defined "reasonable accommodation" and "undue hardship" as used in the Human Rights Act, and added Subsections R and S.
The 2007 amendment, effective July 1, 2007, defined "bureau" as the human rights bureau of the labor relations division of the workforce solutions department and "secretary" as the secretary of workforce solutions.
The 2003 amendment, effective July 1, 2003, in Subsection M, substituted "a person's" for "an individual's" preceding "major life activities", substituted "A person" for "An individual" preceding "is also considered"; and added Subsections P and Q.
The 1993 amendment, effective June 18, 1993, substituted "labor department" for "department of labor" in Subsection D.
Commercial photography business was a public accommodation. — Where plaintiff offered photography services to the public on a commercial basis and solicited customers by offering its services to the public at large through its website, advertisements on multiple search engines, and in the Yellow Pages; and plaintiff did not participate in selective advertising, such as telephone solicitation, or in any way seek to target a select group of people through its advertisements, plaintiff constituted a public accommodation under the Human Rights Act, Section 28-1-1 NMSA 1978 et seq. Elane Photography, LLC v. Willock, 2012-NMCA-086, 284 P.3d 428, cert. granted, 2012-NMCERT-008.
University of New Mexico is not a "public accommodation" within the meaning of the New Mexico Human Rights Act, and is not subject to the jurisdiction of the human rights commission in the instance of a nursing student's complaint of racial discrimination. Human Rights Comm'n v. Board of Regents, 1981-NMSC-026, 95 N.M. 576, 624 P.2d 518, overruled by Johnson v. Bd. of Educ. for Albuquerque Pub. Schs., 2025-NMSC-014.
Public schools are public accommodations and are therefore subject to the New Mexico Human Rights Act. — The New Mexico Human Rights Act (NMHRA) defines "public accommodations" as "any establishment that provides or offers its services, facilities, accommodations or goods to the public," and therefore public schools can be classified as public accommodations under the NMHRA because public schools are institutions that not only offer services to all school age children but also collaborate with their families and communities, and therefore embrace the plain language of the statute that a public school is an establishment that provides or offers its services to the public. Johnson v. Bd. of Educ. for Albuquerque Pub. Schs., 2025-NMSC-014, aff'g 2023-NMCA-069, 535 P.3d 687 and overruling Human Rights Comm'n of New Mexico v. Bd. of Regents of Univ. of N.M. College of Nursing, 1981-NMSC-026, 95 N.M. 576, 624 P.2d 518.
Public secondary schools are public accommodations subject to the New Mexico Human Rights Act. — Albuquerque public schools offer services to the community as a whole such that refusing educational services based on race, religion, or any other protected category would contravene legislative intent under NMSA 1978, § 28-1-7(F), and therefore public secondary schools are public accommodations subject to the New Mexico Human Rights Act. Johnson v. Bd. of Educ., 2023-NMCA-069, cert. granted.
Where plaintiff, a sixteen-year-old Native American student enrolled in a public high school in Albuquerque, New Mexico, filed a complaint alleging a violation of the New Mexico Human Rights Act, NMSA 1978, §§ 28-1-1 to 28-1-15, against defendants, after plaintiff's English teacher, during an in-classroom Halloween activity, cut several inches of hair from another Native American student and asked that student if she were a "bloody Indian" and where defendants filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that public secondary schools are not public accommodations in the administration of their academic programs, the district court erred in granting defendants' motion for summary judgment, because a state-created public school enacting its constitutional mandate to educate school-age children falls within the definition of "public accommodation" as intended by the legislature. Johnson v. Bd. of Educ., 2023-NMCA-069, cert. granted.
Meaning of "places of accommodation" in former law. — Single dwellings, duplexes and apartment buildings, being in their nature distinctly private, were not "places of accommodation" as defined in the Civil Rights Act, 49-8-1 to 49-8-7, 1953 Comp. (now repealed), and consequently the restrictions against discrimination did not apply thereto. 1963 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 63-150 (opinion rendered under prior law).
Law reviews. — For note and comment, "New Tort Rules Unmarried Partners: The Enhanced Potential for Successful Loss of Consortium and NIED Claims by Same Sex Partners in New Mexico After Lozoya", see 34 N.M.L. Rev. 461 (2004).
For comment, "Public Accommodations in New Mexico: The Right to Refuse Service for Reasons Other Than Race or Religion," see 10 Nat. Resources J. 635 (1970).
For article, "Age Discrimination in Employment: A Comparison of the Federal and State Laws and Remedies in New Mexico," see 7 N.M.L. Rev. 51 (1976-77).
For note, "Human Rights Commission v. Board of Regents: Should a University be Considered a Public Accommodation Under the New Mexico Human Rights Act"? see 12 N.M.L. Rev. 541 (1982).
Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — What constitutes private club or association not otherwise open to public that is exempt from state civil rights statute, 83 A.L.R.5th 467.
Meaning of term "employer" as defined in § 701(b) of Title VII of Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended (42 USCS § 2000e(b)), 69 A.L.R. Fed. 191.
Who is "employer" within meaning of Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (29 USCS § 621 et seq.), 137 A.L.R. Fed. 551.
What constitutes religious harassment in employment in violation of Title VII of Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 USCA § 2000e et seq.), 149 A.L.R. Fed. 405.
What constitutes reverse or majority race or national origin discrimination violative of federal constitution or statutes - nonemployment cases, 152 A.L.R. Fed. 1