N.M. Stat. Ann. § 16-2-11
B. Sites that may be designated as state parks or state recreational areas shall be only those:
C. Lands designated for acquisition or development as state parks or state recreational areas shall be those that:
D. Lands that are acquired or developed as state parks or state recreational areas shall be managed and developed according to the following objectives:
E. Factors to be taken into consideration when lands are considered for acquisition or development as state parks or state recreational areas are:
G. All lands considered for acquisition or development as new state parks or state recreational areas shall undergo a feasibility study prior to acquisition or development. Feasibility studies shall include:
History: Laws 1935, ch. 57, § 11; 1941 Comp., § 4-111; Laws 1941, ch. 100, § 1; 1953 Comp., § 4-9-11; Laws 1963, ch. 98, § 11; 1977, ch. 254, § 21; 1981, ch. 93, § 1; 1997, ch. 145, § 1; 2005, ch. 154, § 1.
Cross references. — For distributions to the public project revolving fund from governmental gross receipts tax, see 7-1-6.38 NMSA 1978.
For New Mexico Youth Conservation Corps Act, see 9-5B-1 to 9-5B-11 NMSA 1978.
For the state parks division, see 9-5A-6.1 NMSA 1978.
Compiler’s notes. — Laws 2009, ch. 168, § 1 provided that the proceeds from the disposal of the surplus property in McKinley county owned by the state parks division of the energy, minerals and natural resources department are appropriated to the state parks division of the energy, minerals and natural resources department for expenditure in fiscal years 2009 through 2019 for the purpose of matching federal funds or making improvements or purchasing adjacent lands at state parks or at other parks authorized or to be authorized for acquisition by the legislature. Any unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining at the end of fiscal year 2019 shall revert to the general fund.
Laws 2009, ch. 168, § 1 provided that the appropriation in Laws 2009, ch. 168, § 1 is contingent upon legislative ratification and approval, during the first session of the forty-ninth legislature, of the disposal of the surplus McKinley county property. House Joint Resolution 7 (Laws 2009), which was approved during the first session of the forty-ninth legislature and signed on March 20, 2009, authorized the state parks division of the energy, minerals and natural resources department's disposal of the surplus McKinley county property.
Senate Joint Resolution No. 4 (Laws 2001) authorized the state parks division of the energy, minerals and natural resources department to purchase, from willing sellers, lands adjacent to the exterior boundaries of Coyote Creek state park, Oliver Lee memorial state park and Pancho Villa state park that have been identified in the park management plans previously adopted by the division, using funds made available to it by the federal government and other public or private sources to the extent such funds may permit.
Laws 1999, ch. 59, § 1, effective June 18, 1999, provided that the commissioner of public lands may negotiate, on behalf of the state trust beneficiaries, for the acquisition of the Eagle Nest lake, dam and the surrounding land; and upon completion of successful negotiations, certify to the secretary of finance and administration that the negotiations have been successful, that the trade is in the best interests of the state trust beneficiaries, and that the appraised value of the land is equal to or lower than the appraised value of the acquired property; further provides that in negotiating the acquisition, the commissioner may agree to trade state land in the same area or vicinity for the lake, dam, and surrounding area; and further provides that if the negotiations and acquisitions pursuant to this section are successful, the commissioner of public lands shall lease the Eagle Nest lake, dam and surrounding area to the state parks division of the energy, minerals and natural resources department, on terms that are in the best interests of the state trust beneficiaries, for use as a state park and fishing area.
Laws 1999, ch. 191, §§ 1 to 3 authorized the negotiation by the state game commission [state wildlife commission] for the acquisition of Eagle Nest dam and reservoir and provide for the repeal of the act on February 1, 2000.
The 2005 amendment, effective June 17, 2005, deleted the provision in Subsection G which provided that ongoing projects that have received an appropriation as of the effective date of this section are exempted from the requirements of this section and provided in Subsection J that lands that are adjacent to or contiguous to an existing state park or recreational area or that are necessary to protect or develop the park or recreational area may be acquired without legislative approval if the state board of finance approves the acquisition and funds for the acquisition are available.
The 1997 amendment, effective July 1, 1999, made minor stylistic changes throughout the section; rewrote Subsection A; rewrote Paragraph E(4); deleted the second sentence in the introductory paragraph of Subsection G relating to a specific appropriation to fund the feasibility study; substituted "land" for "real property" in Subsection J; and added Subsection K.
Status of lake for purposes of state immunity. — Evidence that park containing lake in which plaintiff’s minor child was injured was leased to the Recreation Division with the sole objective of using it for recreation, that fees were charged for its use, and that it contained facilities provided for public use while visiting the park, established that park fell within the category of public parks for purposes of state tort immunity. Bell v. N.M. Interstate Stream Comm’n, 1993-NMCA-164, 117 N.M. 71, 868 P.2d 1269.
State officials proper defendants in action on lease agreement. — In an action alleging that state officials, acting under this section and Sections 16-2-12 and 16-2-13 NMSA 1978 in authorizing the development of recreation areas under a lease agreement with the United States, violated federal law, the state officials, and not the state, were the proper defendants, since the state cannot "authorize" officials to violate federal law. Elephant Butte Irrigation Dist. v. Department of Interior, 160 F.3d 602 (10th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1019, 119 S. Ct. 1255, 143 L. Ed. 2d 352 (1999).
County ordinance cannot limit state's authority. — County land use ordinances attempting to restrict traditional federal and state regulatory authority are preempted by this section which allows the state to acquire lands for park and recreational purposes and, thus, county ordinances are of no consequence. 1994 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 94-01.
Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — Estate conveyed by deed for park or playground purposes, nature of, 15 A.L.R.2d 975.
Land developer: validity and construction of statute or ordinance requiring land developer to dedicate portion of land for recreational purposes, or make payment in lieu thereof, 43 A.L.R.3d 862.