N.M. Stat. Ann. § 1-19-26.4
B. The requirements of Subsection A of this section do not apply to the following:
D. If a person creates, produces or purchases an advertisement that contains materially deceptive media, the advertisement shall include a disclaimer. The disclaimer shall appear in a clear and conspicuous manner in every language used in the advertisement and shall indicate: "This ____ has been manipulated or generated by artificial intelligence". The blank line in the disclaimer shall be filled with each of the following terms that describes the media:
E. The disclaimer required in Subsection D of this section shall be included as follows:
G. It is not a violation of this section for:
History: Laws 2019, ch. 262, § 2; 2024, ch. 57, § 2.
The 2024 amendment, effective May 15, 2024, added a disclaimer requirement for materially deceptive media, provided that a person found to have violated the disclaimer requirement is subject to civil penalties, and provided certain exceptions; in the section heading, added "artificial intelligence; materially deceptive media; violation; penalty"; and added Subsections D through H.
Campaign Reporting Act's definition of "artificial intelligence" is not unconstitutionally vague. — The definition of "artificial intelligence," as provided in 1-19-26(C) NMSA 1978 as a "machine-based or computer-based system that through hardware or software uses input data to emulate the structure and characteristics of input data in order to generate synthetic content, including images, video or audio" can reasonably be understood on its face by a person of ordinary intelligence as applying to generative AI applications capable of producing realistic deepfakes, and therefore the definition does not appear to be facially overbroad or unconstitutionally vague. 2025 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 25-09.
Statutes that create disclaimer language for political speech are subject to exacting scrutiny. — Statutes that create disclaimer requirements for political speech are subject to a lower standard of exacting scrutiny, rather than strict scrutiny, because such laws impose no ceiling on campaign-related activities and do not prevent anyone from speaking. Exacting scrutiny requires that the disclaimer requirement bear a substantial relationship to a sufficiently important governmental interest, and it requires that the disclaimer requirement be narrowly tailored to the government's asserted interest. 2025 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 25-09.
Constitutionality of disclaimer requirement. — The disclaimer requirement in 1-19-26.4(D) NMSA 1978 prevents viewers or listeners from being misled into believing that an advertisement depicts conduct or speech genuinely engaged in by the depicted individual. The disclaimer serves the sufficiently important governmental interest in protecting the voting public from misinformation or disinformation about an election, does not create an undue burden on an advertiser, and is narrowly tailored to the government interests it serves. The statute is therefore not impermissibly overbroad on its face. 2025 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 25-09.
The legislature's decision to exclude consensual depictions from the reach of the Campaign Reporting Act does not violate the first amendment. — The legislature intended to prevent a person's likeness from being used for a portrayal that the person had not approved; the legislature viewed a lack of consent as an integral component of the deception and falsity of the media. The disclaimer requirement in 1-19-26.4(D) NMSA 1978 merely alerts a viewer or listener that the depiction of the individual is not genuine, a disclaimer that would have less impact for consensual renderings. The disclaimer requirement is therefore substantially related to an important governmental interest and is narrowly tailored to the interest, and therefore the legislature's decision to exclude consensual depictions from the reach of the Campaign Reporting Act does not violate the first amendment. 2025 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 25-09.
Disclaimer requirement for advertisement reasonably constituting satire or parody is likely unconstitutional on its face. — The legislature expressly provided that an advertisement that reasonably constitutes satire or parody does not violate this section "if the advertisement includes a disclaimer consistent with the requirements provided in Subsection D of this section." Section 1-19-26.4 NMSA 1978 is designed to protect against misleading advertisements. By its nature, however, an advertisement that reasonably constitutes satire or parody is not likely to mislead a reasonable viewer or listener. The disclaimer is thus not substantially related to the governmental interests it is designed to protect and is not narrowly tailored for this purpose. 2025 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 25-09.
A political committee may make a coordinated expenditure on an advertisement that advocates both the election of clearly identified candidates and the passage of a clearly identified ballot question. — The Campaign Reporting Act, generally, does not purport to regulate the contents of a political committee's advertisements, and therefore, where a political committee intends to make a coordinated expenditure on an advertisement that advocates both the election of clearly identified candidates and the passage of a clearly identified ballot question, there is no violation of the Campaign Reporting Act. Whether an advertisement refers to a ballot question is immaterial to its classification as a coordinated or independent expenditure. For the coordinated expenditure, however, the political committee would be subject to contribution limits and disclosure requirements. 2022 Op. Ethics Comm'n No. 2022-08.