N.M. Stat. Ann. § 1-19-26
As used in the Campaign Reporting Act:
A. "advertisement" means a communication referring to a candidate or ballot question that is published, disseminated, distributed or displayed to the public by print, broadcast, satellite, cable or electronic media, including recorded phone messages, or by printed materials, including mailers, handbills, signs and billboards, but "advertisement" does not include:
H. "candidate" means an individual who seeks or considers an office in an election covered by the Campaign Reporting Act, including a public official, who has filed a declaration of candidacy and has not subsequently filed a statement of withdrawal or:
I. "contribution":
J. "coordinated expenditure" means an expenditure that is made:
(3) for the purpose of:
Q. "independent expenditure" means an expenditure that is:
(3) made to pay for an advertisement that:
S. "materially deceptive media" means an image, video or audio that:
U. "political committee" means:
History: 1978 Comp., § 1-19-26, enacted by Laws 1979, ch. 360, § 2; 1981, ch. 331, § 1; 1985, ch. 2, § 10; 1993, ch. 46, § 1; 1993, ch. 55, § 12; 1993, ch. 314, § 58; 1995, ch. 153, § 1; 1997, ch. 112, § 2; 2003, ch. 66, § 1; 2009, ch. 67, § 1; 2009, ch. 68, § 2; 2019, ch. 262, § 4; 2024, ch. 57, § 1.
The 2024 amendment, effective May 15, 2024, added the definitions of "artificial intelligence", "depicted individual", "distribution platform" and "materially deceptive media" to the Campaign Reporting Act; added a new Subsection C and redesignated former Subsections C through J as Subsections D through K, respectively; added new Subsections L and M and redesignated former Subsections K through O as Subsections N through R, respectively; and added a new Subsection S and redesignated former Subsections P through V as Subsections T through Z, respectively.
The 2019 amendment, effective July 1, 2019, defined "advertisement", "ballot question", "campaign expenditure", "coordinated expenditure", "independent expenditure", "legislative caucus committee", and "political party", and revised and removed the definitions of certain terms, as used in the Campaign Reporting Act; deleted former Subsection A, which defined "advertising campaign", and added a new Subsection A; added a new Subsection C and redesignated former Subsections C and D as Subsections D and E, respectively; in Subsection D, after "financial institution", deleted "located in New Mexico" and added "regulated by the United States or a state of the United States"; in Subsection E, after "authorized by a candidate to", deleted "raise, collect or expend contributions" and added "act", and after "office;", added "provided that a candidate shall not authorize more than one campaign committee"; added a new Subsection F and redesignated former Subsections E and F as Subsections G and H, respectively; in Subsection G, in the introductory clause, after "declaration of candidacy" deleted "or nominating petition" and added "and has not subsequently filed a statement of withdrawal", in Paragraph G(2), after "made expenditures of", deleted "two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500)", after "more", added "than three thousand dollars "($3,000)", after "make expenditures of", deleted "two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500)", and after "more", added "than three thousand dollars ($3,000)"; in Subsection H, added paragraph designations "(1)" and "(3)" and Paragraphs H(2) and H(4); added a new Subsection I and redesignated former Subsections G through J as Subsections J through M, respectively; in Subsection M, after "pre-primary convention", deleted "but does not include the administrative or solicitation expenses of a political committee that are paid by an organization that sponsors the committee"; added new Subsections N and O and redesignated former Subsections K and L as Subsections P and Q, respectively; in Subsection Q, after "means", deleted the remainder of the introductory clause, deleted former Paragraphs (1) through (3), and added new Paragraphs Q(1) through Q(4); added new Subsection R and redesignated former Subsection M and N as Subsections S and T, respectively; in Subsection S, after "means", deleted "influencing or attempting to influence an election or pre-primary convention, including a constitutional amendment or other question submitted to the voters" and added "for the purpose of supporting or opposing a ballot question or the nomination or election of a candidate"; deleted former Subsection O, which defined "proper filing officer", and redesignated former Subsections P and Q as Subsections U and V, respectively.
2009 Amendments. — Laws 2009, ch. 68, § 2, effective November 3, 2010, in Subsection L(1), added "political parties".
Laws 2009, ch. 67, § 1, effective June 19, 2009, deleted Subsection R, which defined "statement of exception".
Severability. — Laws 2009, ch. 68, § 5 provided that if any part or application of this act is held invalid, the remainder or its application to other situations or persons shall not be affected.
The 2003 amendment, effective June 20, 2003, in Subsection G, inserted "to deliver" preceding "by certified", substituted "transmission" for "mail" preceding "or facsimile"; inserted "political committee" near the end of Subsection L; added designations Paragraphs L(1) to L(3); deleted "provided that a political committee includes" at the end of Paragraph L(1); substituted "five hundred dollars ($500)" for "two thousand dollars ($2,000)" in Paragraph L(3); inserted "or electronic format" in Subsection N.
The 1997 amendment, effective June 20, 1997, added Subsection A and redesignated the following subsections accordingly.
The 1995 amendment, effective June 1, 1995, added Subsections H, J, N, O, and Q and redesignated the remaining subsections accordingly; in Subsection D, inserted "including a public official" and "nominating petition or"; in Subsection G, deleted "regular" before "primary"; in Subsection P, inserted "public official" and deleted "who contributes, receives contributions or makes expenditures as defined in the Campaign Reporting Act" following "political committee"; and made minor stylistic changes throughout the section.
The 1993 amendment, effective June 18, 1993, rewrote the section to the extent that a detailed comparison would be impracticable.
Campaign Reporting Act's "appeal to vote" definition is neither overbroad nor unconstitutionally vague. — Plaintiffs, arguing that the Campaign Reporting Act's definition of "independent expenditure" as an expenditure for an advertisement "susceptible to no other reasonable interpretation than as an appeal to vote for or against a clearly identified candidate or ballot question" was overbroad and vague, failed to establish that the definition in NMSA 1978, § 1-19-26(N)(3)(b) prohibited a substantial amount of protected speech. The Campaign Reporting Act's definition of "appeal to vote" in § 1-19-26(N)(3)(b), therefore, is neither overbroad nor unconstitutionally vague. Republican Party of N.M. v. Torrez, ___ F.Supp.3d ___ (D. N.M. 2023).
Campaign Reporting Act's "electioneering communication" definition is neither overbroad nor unconstitutionally vague. — Where plaintiffs challenged as overbroad and vague the Campaign Reporting Act's definition of "independent expenditure" as an expenditure for an advertisement that "refers to a clearly identified candidate or ballot question and is published and disseminated to the relevant electorate in New Mexico within thirty days before the primary election or sixty days before the general election at which the candidate or ballot question is on the ballot", and where plaintiffs argued that this definition, in NMSA 1978, 1-19-26(N)(3)(c), requires disclosure of all communications about a candidate or a ballot measure that are made close to an election, regardless of whether the speech qualifies as express advocacy and regardless of whether the communication is cabined in terms of medium and number of viewers targeted, plaintiffs failed in their burden of showing a substantial number of applications of the Campaign Reporting Act's definition of "independent expenditure" are unconstitutional, judged in relation to the statute's plainly legitimate sweep. The Campaign Reporting Act's definition of "electioneering communication" in § 1-19-26(N)(3)(c), therefore, is neither overbroad nor unconstitutionally vague. Republican Party of N.M. v. Torrez, ___ F.Supp.3d ___ (D. N.M. 2023).
Campaign Reporting Act's definition of "artificial intelligence" is not unconstitutionally vague. — This section's definition of "artificial intelligence" as a "machine-based or computer-based system that through hardware or software uses input data to emulate the structure and characteristics of input data in order to generate synthetic content, including images, video or audio" can reasonably be understood on its face by a person of ordinary intelligence as applying to generative AI applications capable of producing realistic deepfakes, and therefore the definition does not appear to be facially overbroad or unconstitutionally vague. 2025 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 25-09.
Defining political committee. — The secretary of state cannot regulate as political committees those organizations which do not engage in express advocacy or the functional equivalent of advocacy for the election or defeat of candidates. New Mexico Youth Organized v. Herrera, No. 09-2212 (10th Cir. June 30, 2010).
Expenditures for political purposes independently of a candidate. — An expenditure of funds for political purposes separately and independently of a candidate is not, by itself, an in-kind contribution to the candidate. If, however, the person gives the goods, services or other product of the expenditure to the candidate, the goods, services or other product will constitute an in-kind contribution. 2010 Op. Att’y Gen. No. 10-03.
A political committee that makes contributions to candidates may solicit unlimited contributions from allowable persons on behalf of political committees that only make "independent expenditures". — The Campaign Reporting Act, §§ 1-19-25 to 1-19-36 NMSA 1978, limits the amounts persons may contribute to candidates, candidates' campaign committees, and political committees during primary and general election cycles, and further prohibits persons, including political committees, from knowingly soliciting or accepting contributions from other persons, including political committees, that exceed these limits, § 1-19-34.7(A)(1), (E), but § 1-19-34.7(I) provides that these limits and prohibitions do not apply to political committees that make "independent expenditures" only, and therefore a political committee that only makes independent expenditures may indirectly solicit unlimited contributions through a political committee that makes contributions to candidates, and further, a political committee that makes contributions to candidates may solicit unlimited contributions on behalf of a political committee that only makes independent expenditures. For similar reasons, an officeholder and a candidate may request third-party donors to contribute at any amount to a political committee that only makes independent expenditures. 2022 Op. Ethics Comm'n No. 2022-05.
A candidate may not solicit unlimited contributions for a political committee that makes expenditures to support the candidate's election. — The Campaign Reporting Act's prohibitions on fundraising do not apply to political committees that only make "independent expenditures", but if a candidate solicits contributions to be given to a political committee, and the political committee uses contributions to pay for advertisements supporting the candidate's election, then the political committee is not making an "independent expenditure", but is making a "coordinated expenditure", which is prohibited by 1-19-34.7(E) NMSA 1978. 2022 Op. Ethics Comm'n No. 2022-05.
Energy company's payment of legislators' expenses incidental to an educational tour need not be reported as in-kind donations. — Payments from an energy company that is proposing to build a nuclear waste storage facility in southeastern New Mexico for members of the New Mexico legislature to attend a series of educational programs at the company's Missouri nuclear generating station are not required to be reported by legislators on their filings with the secretary of state, because the energy company's payment of reasonable expenses for flights, meals, refreshments, and lodging incidental to the educational tour are not given for a political purpose and therefore are not contributions under 1-19-26(H)(1) NMSA 1978. 2020 Op. Ethics Comm'n No. 2020-03.
The Campaign Reporting Act does not apply to federal elections. — Members of the New Mexico legislature and certain other elected officials are prohibited from knowingly soliciting contributions governed by the Campaign Reporting Act between January 1 and the adjournment of any regular legislative session and between the proclamation and adjournment of any special session, 1-19-34.1 NMSA 1978, but the Campaign Reporting Act only applies to candidates in primary, general or statewide special elections in New Mexico and excludes federal elections from the application of the act, and therefore a New Mexico state legislator who solicited campaign contributions for the federal office of United States Representative during a state legislative session did not violate the Campaign Reporting Act. 2021 Op. Ethics Comm'n No. 2021-05.
Federal election law expressly preempts state election law with respect to election to federal office. — The Federal Election Campaign Act, 52 U.S.C. §§ 30101 et seq., expressly provides that it, and the rules prescribed under it, supersede and preempt any provision of state law with respect to election to federal office, and would therefore preempt any interpretation or application of New Mexico's Campaign Reporting Act (act), 1-19-25 to 1-19-36 NMSA 1978, that would prevent a state candidate from donating campaign funds to a candidate for federal office. As a result, the New Mexico secretary of state does not have the authority under the act to restrict donations from a state candidate's campaign funds to federal candidates. Campaign Reporting Act (9/2/21), Att'y Gen. Adv. Ltr. 2021-11.
The Campaign Reporting Act (CRA) does not prohibit candidates for local elected office from using contributions received in local elections to support the candidate's subsequent campaign for an office covered by the CRA. — The Campaign Reporting Act (CRA) excludes municipal and special district offices from its definition of "election" thereby excepting candidates seeking municipal or special district elected office from the CRA's requirements concerning registration, disclosure, contributions, and expenditures, and the School District Campaign Reporting Act, §§ 1-22A-1 to 1-22A-10 NMSA 1978, permits the use of contributions for a candidate's election to any public office, including a public office subject to the CRA, and therefore a candidate for municipal, school district, or special district elected office is not prohibited by the CRA from using contributions to that candidacy to support the candidates subsequent campaign for an office covered by the CRA. Municipalities and special districts, however, may limit contributions or impose restrictions on the permissible use of those contributions by candidates for municipal or special district elected office. 2022 Op. Ethics Comm'n No. 2022-02.