I. Except as otherwise provided in RSA 458-A:15, a court of this state has jurisdiction to make an initial child-custody determination only if:
- (a) This state is the home state of the child on the date of the commencement of the proceeding, or was the home state of the child within 6 months before the commencement of the proceeding and the child is absent from this state but a parent or person acting as a parent continues to live in this state.
(b) A court of another state does not have jurisdiction under subparagraph (a), or a court of the home state of the child has declined to exercise jurisdiction on the ground that this state is the more appropriate forum under RSA 458-A:18 or RSA 458-A:19, and:
- (1) The child and the child's parents, or the child and at least one parent or a person acting as a parent, have a significant connection with this state other than mere physical presence; and
- (2) Substantial evidence is available in this state concerning the child's care, protection, training, and personal relationships.
- (c) All courts having jurisdiction under subparagraph (a) or (b) have declined to exercise jurisdiction on the ground that a court of this state is the more appropriate forum to determine the custody of the child under RSA 458-A:18 or RSA 458-A:19.
- (d) No court of any other state would have jurisdiction under the criteria specified in subparagraph (a), (b), or (c).
- II. Paragraph I is the exclusive jurisdictional basis for making a child-custody determination by a court of this state.
- III. Physical presence of, or personal jurisdiction over, a party or a child is not necessary or sufficient to make a child-custody determination.
Source. 2009, 191:1, eff. Dec. 1, 2010.