That the delegates to the conventions elected as provided for in this act shall meet at the seat of government of each of said territories, except the delegates elected in South Dakota, who shall meet at the city of Sioux Falls, on the fourth day of July, 1889, and, after organization, shall declare on behalf of the people of said proposed states, that they adopt the Constitution of the United States; whereupon the said conventions shall be, and are hereby authorized to form constitutions and state governments for said proposed states, respectively. The Constitution shall be republican in form, and make no distinction in civil or political rights on account of race or color, except as to Indians not taxed, and not be repugnant to the Constitution of the United States and the principles of the Declaration of Independence. And said convention shall provide by ordinances irrevocable without the consent of the United States and the people of said states: First. That perfect toleration of religious sentiment shall be secured, and that no inhabitant of said states shall ever be molested in person or property on account of his or her mode of religious worship. Second. That the people inhabiting said proposed states do agree and declare that they forever disclaim all right and title to the unappropriated public lands lying within the boundaries thereof, and to all lands lying within said limits owned or held by any Indian or Indian tribes; and that until the title thereto shall have been extinguished by the United States, the same shall be and remain subject to the disposition of the United States, and said Indian lands shall remain under the absolute jurisdiction and control of the Congress of the United States; that the lands belonging to citizens of the United States residing without the said states shall never be taxed at a higher rate than the lands belonging to residents thereof; that no taxes shall be imposed by the states on lands or property therein belonging to or which may hereafter be purchased by the United States or reserved for its use. But nothing herein, or in the ordinances herein provided for, shall preclude the said states from taxing as other lands are taxed any lands owned or held by any Indian who has severed his tribal relations, and has obtained from the United States or from any person a title thereto by patent or other grant, save and except such lands as have been or may be granted to any Indian or Indians under any act of Congress containing a provision exempting the lands thus granted from taxation; but said ordinances shall provide that all such lands shall be exempt from taxation by said states so long and to such extent as such act of Congress may prescribe. Third. That the debts and liabilities of said territories shall be assumed and paid by said states, respectively. Fourth. That provision shall be made for the establishment and maintenance of systems of public schools, which shall be open to all the children of said states, and free from sectarian control. Indian Lands. -Federal Jurisdiction and Control. Since jurisdiction and control of Indian lands remains in the United States under section 4 of the Enabling Act, congress could enact an act making criminal the introduction of intoxicating liquor upon an allotment within the limits of an Indian reservation. United States v. Sutton, 215 U.S. 291, 30 S. Ct. 116, 54 L. Ed. 200 (1909). Lands within South Dakota which were formerly a part of an Indian reservation and not restored to the public domain and open to settlement, but held by an Indian allottee under a trust patent, are Indian lands over which the United States has exclusive jurisdiction. Ex Parte Van Moore, 221 F. 954 (D. S.D. 1915). Under the Enabling Act and the disclaimer provision in the Constitution of South Dakota, not only lands, but all other property issued by the United States government to Indian allottees for use thereon, remained subject to federal control until Congress relinquished the trust. United States v. Pearson, 231 F. 270 (D.S.D. 1916). Whether Indian pantentees of land in a reservation, created by Indian treaty, took to high or low watermark of a lake was not a question of state law. Montana Power Co. v. Rochester, 127 F.2d 189 (9th Cir. 1942). -Jurisdiction of State. The compact between the United States and North Dakota created by section 4 of the Enabling Act and art. XIII, § 1 of the state Constitution did not reserve to the United States exclusive jurisdiction of civil causes of action not involving lands, between Indians residing on reservations. Vermilion v. Spotted Elk, 85 N.W.2d 432 (N.D. 1957). -Voting Rights of Indians. It was the duty of county commissioners to establish a voting precinct within or for a territory situated within the county limits and also within the limits of an Indian reservation, where the territory had, under an act of Congress, been allotted to certain Indians and they were living upon the allotments and farming the same. State ex rel. Tompton v. Denoyer, 6 N.D. 586, Schools and School Districts An act of the territorial legislature organizing an independent school district was subject to amendment by the state legislature. Jones v. Brightwood Indep. Sch. Dist., 63 N.D. 275, State Political and Governmental Control. Section 4, subdivision 2, of the Enabling Act and the compact embraced in art. XIII, § 1 of the state Constitution, vested in the state all jurisdiction not expressly reserved in the Congress of the United States, over certain territory embraced in what is known as the Ft. Berthold Indian reservation. State ex rel. Baker v. Mountrail County, 28 N.D. 389, 149 N.W. 120 (1914). The state may rightfully exercise political and governmental control over lands formerly within a military reservation and reserved by the United States for Indian school and Indian agency purposes, to the extent of including them within its political subdivisions for political and governmental purposes. La Duke v. Melin, 45 N.D. 349, 177 N.W. 673 (1920). Unappropriated Public Lands. The beds of navigable streams are not "unappropriated public lands" included within the disclaimer of title contained in section 4 of the Enabling Act. State v. Loy, 74 N.D. 182, 20 N.W.2d 668 (1945).