N.D. Admin. Code § 45-03-23-02
1. An insurance company may provide, by written agreement with a custodian, for the custody of its securities with a custodian. The securities that are the subject of the agreement may be held by the custodian or its agent or in a clearing corporation.
2. The agreement must be in writing and must be authorized by the resolution of the board of directors of the insurance company or of an authorized committee of the board. The terms of the agreement must comply with the following: a. Securities certificates held by the custodian must be held separate from the securities of the custodian and of all of its other customers. b. Securities held indirectly by the custodian and securities in a clearing corporation must be separately identified on the custodian's official records as being owned by the insurance company. The records must identify which securities are held by the custodian or by its agent and which securities are in a clearing corporation. If the securities are in a clearing corporation, the records must also identify where the securities are and, if in a clearing corporation, the name of the clearing corporation and, if through an agent, the name of the agent. c. All custodied securities that are registered must be registered in the name of the company or in the name of a nominee of the company or in the name of the custodian or its nominee or, if in a clearing corporation, in the name of the clearing corporation or its nominee. d. Custodied securities shall be held subject to the instructions of the insurance company and shall be withdrawable upon the demand of the insurance company, except that custodied securities used to meet the deposit requirements set forth in North Dakota Century Code section 26.1-05-23 must, to the extent required by that section, be under the control of the insurance commissioner and must not be withdrawn by the insurance company without the commissioner's approval.
securities or their value thereof and the value of any loss of rights or privileges resulting from the loss of securities.
n. The agreement may provide that the custodian will not be liable for any failure to take any action required to be taken under the agreement in the event and to the extent that the taking of such action is prevented or delayed by war (whether declared or not and including existing wars), revolution, insurrection, riot, civil commotion, act of God, accident, fire, explosion, stoppage of labor, strikes or other differences with employees, laws, rules, orders, or other acts of any governmental authority, or any other cause whatever beyond its reasonable control.
o. In the event that the custodian gains entry in a clearing corporation through an agent, there shall be an agreement between the custodian and the agent under which the agent shall be subject to the same liability for loss of custodied securities as the custodian; provided, however, that if the agent shall be subject to regulation under the laws of a jurisdiction which is different from the jurisdiction the laws of which regulate the custodian, the insurance commissioner of the state of domicile of the insurance company may accept a standard of liability applicable to the agent which is different from the standard of liability applicable to the custodian.
p. The custodian shall provide written notification to the insurer's domiciliary commissioner if the custodial agreement with the insurer has been terminated or if one hundred percent of the account assets in any one custody account have been withdrawn. This notification shall be remitted to the insurance commissioner within three business days of the receipt by the custodian of the insurer's written notice of termination or within three business days of the withdrawal of one hundred percent of the account assets.
3. An insurer having direct written and assumed premiums of less than three million dollars in any calendar year may request an exemption from the requirements of this section. The insurer must file with the commissioner a written statement explaining the reasons why the insurer should be exempt. The commissioner may grant an exemption if the commissioner finds that compliance with this section would constitute a financial or organizational hardship upon the insurer.
History: Effective March 1, 2004; amended effective April 1, 2010; July 1, 2012.
General Authority: NDCC 28-32-02
Law Implemented: NDCC 26.1-05-35