1. (a) Each offer by an unlicensed person to practice as an interpreter or transliterator for a fee or other consideration shall constitute a separate violation for which a separate penalty may be assessed.
2. (b) Each representation by an unlicensed person that such person is a licensed interpreter or transliterator shall constitute a separate violation for which a separate penalty may be assessed.
3. (c) Each time an unlicensed person uses the title "Licensed Interpreter for the Deaf", "Licensed Transliterator for the Deaf", or any other title or abbreviation to indicate that the person is a licensed interpreter or transliterator shall constitute a separate violation for which a separate penalty may be assessed.
4. (d) An advertisement that violates Paragraphs (a), (b), or (c) of this Rule shall constitute a single violation each day it is published.
5. (e) Each interpreting or transliterating engagement that violates a licensing statute or rule shall constitute a separate violation for which a separate penalty may be assessed.
6. (f) Each day a violation persists shall constitute a separate violation for which a separate penalty may be assessed.

History Note: Authority G.S. 90D-14(c); S.L. 2005-299, s.4;
Eff. August 1, 2007;
Pursuant to G.S. 150B-21.3A, rule is necessary without substantive public interest Eff. July 22, 2017.