29-255 C.M.R. ch. 3
These rules provide (a) standards to be used by State agencies for imaging records; (b) criteria for using digital and microfilm copies; (c) standards for storing digital and microfilm copies of permanent records; and (d) information concerning digital and microfilm services available from the Maine State Archives.
State agencies interested in digitally imaging archival records need to contact the Maine State Archives as archival records cannot be destroyed; the original document must be kept.
5. STATE AGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES
If a third‐party vendor or some other outside entity digitizes a record for a state agency they must ensure the third party is in compliance with these guidelines. In such cases, a properly written contract must be in place containing the basic requirements of the intended project as well as reference to these guidelines.
6. AUTHENTICITY
Obsolete records and non‐records may be removed from files during document preparation. Staff of the state agency will conduct this work, unless the instructions for identifying obsolete records are completely objective and the ability of a third party to follow these instructions can be verified by staff prior to imaging. If the percentage of obsolete records or non‐records is low, the effort of weeding will likely not be worth the cost.
Multi‐part forms and continuous‐feed computer paper must be separated into single pages. If there are multi‐part forms included within the file, then the parts must be separated. In cases where such forms repeat the information on each page, only the highest quality page will be digitized (such as the top or white copy of the form). Other pages of such multi‐part forms will not be digitized.
Fagile items or items that are torn, otherwise damaged, or on delicate backing (such as onionskin paper or glass) must be handled with care to avoid further damage or even destruction. If these items are interspersed within a body of records, they must be separated from the other items within a folder that marks them as fragile, and the entity conducting the imaging must be provided with instructions on how to handle these documents carefully. If entire boxes of records are fragile, these boxes must be marked as fragile.
Before imaging documents, the state agency or alternatively the vendor chosen to conduct the imaging, will produce an inventory of the documents that records the type of documents (paper, volumes, photographic paper prints, diapositive slides, glass plate negatives, drawings, etc), general characteristics (size, paper color, number of pages, the presence or absence of staples or other fasteners, etc.), and general document quality (undamaged documents, torn documents, onionskin paper, blurry images, or other damage) for the set of records as a whole. This inventory will allow for an assessment of the difficulty of imaging the documents.
Test images of the digital documents intended to be digitized must be created prior to wholesale conversion to ensure quality images can be produced. The number of test images produced will be governed by variations in the source documents. If the records vary widely by age, type , color, or condition, or if they have been produced at various times by various entities in the case of microfilm, test digital images must be made of samples of each set of similar documents.
Indexing must comply with the specific requirements of the state agency but at minimum it must include the following:
Unique Identifier for Documents: Each document (including each multi‐page document) must have a unique filename or other identifier, preferably sequential, which can be numeric, alphanumeric, or alphabetic as required by the government entity. Each filename must be unique across all records series and storage media, not merely within a single disc or other piece of removable media. If required, images will be filed in appropriate electronic folders on the designated storage media.
Indexing Fields/Descriptive Metadata: The index of documents must consist of a number of fields to ensure adequate access to the records. Whenever possible, the field data must consist of objective indexing terms (such as personal names, file numbers, and dates) or terms from a controlled vocabulary (such as subjects or geographical information), rather than subjective data. Index data often includes information such as record type, creation date, record creator, disposition date, among other information.
Indexing Structure: Although the structure of an electronic content management system (ECMS) database is outside the scope of these guidelines, the state agency must have a methodology in place to transfer all the images and corollary index data to the intended retrieval system. The indexing data must be stored in a non‐proprietary format to allow its transfer to other systems and databases as needed through the conversion project and for the entire retention period of the records. Each record within the database must be associated with the respective digital image or document via its unique filename.
Optical Character Recognition: If required, optical character recognition (OCR) or intelligent character recognition (ICR) may be performed to convert digital images into electronic text. The government or its chosen vendor must certify the conversion to be at least 95% accurate as measured by character count, and the converted text must be associated with the respective digital image or document. Due to this error rate, OCR will not be used as the sole finding aid when retrieving digitized images. Some manual indexing is always required.
Directory Structure: Regardless of the image filename, files will be organized in a file directory or folder system that will link to metadata stored elsewhere in a database. Directories may have their own organization independent of the image files, such as folders arranged by date or records series number, or they may replicate the physical or logical organization of the originals being digitized.
Technical Metadata: During the imaging process, production metadata will be maintained either within the individual images or separate from but associated with each body of digitized images. For instance, these metadata may be created as part of a digital file during actual imaging, may be added to the file after imaging, may be associated with each file in an ECMS, or may be retained entirely separate from the files but associated to each file by their unique filenames. These metadata will include, at minimum, the following:
A person or persons other than those digitizing or indexing a particular record must perform the final quality control procedures outlined within this document. In most situations, quality assurance is performed in a two‐step process: the scanner or digital camera operator will perform an initial quality check during the imaging process, and then a different individual will perform a second review in a separate process. If a vendor is conducting the imaging, either the government agency using the services of a vendor or a third party must conduct the quality assurance.
The quality control process must be documented and maintained throughout the digitization conversion process. Information to document includes problem resolution procedures and reporting requirements for each step of a conversion project.
Quality control steps for digitized images must verify the following items:
For acceptable correction of digitized images refer to FADGI Guidelines.
Backups must be stored in areas geographically remote from the offices where the use copies of the records are stored. An appropriate backup location will be one where it is highly unlikely that the backup location will simultaneously suffer the same disaster as the offices.
Regardless of the media used, images must be accessible for the records’ entire retention period.
Digital images and their associated index data must be effectively and efficiently managed over time. Regardless of format, records must be retained until their retention requirements have been met.
Agencies must design and implement migration strategies to counteract hardware and software dependencies of electronic records whenever the records must be maintained and used beyond the life of the information system in which the records are originally created or captured. To successfully protect records against technological obsolescence.
STATUTORY AUTHORITY:
5 M.R.S. §95 sub-§3
RE-ADOPTED:
August 31, 1979
EFFECTIVE DATE (ELECTRONIC CONVERSION):
April 29, 1996
NON-SUBSTANTIVE CORRECTION:
May 29, 1996 - §10(D)
CONVERTED TO MS WORD:
July 11, 2003
REPEALED AND REPLACED:
November 29, 2020 – filing 2020-240
APAO WORD VERSION CONVERSION (IF NEEDED) AND ACCESSIBILITY CHECK: July 19, 2025
APAO ACCESSIBILITY CHECK (Word):