1. (1) This State is the home state of the respondent;

2. (2) On the date the petition is filed, this State is a significant-connection state and:

   1. (i) The respondent does not have a home state or a court of the home state of the respondent has declined to exercise jurisdiction because this State is a more appropriate forum; or

   2. (ii) The respondent has a home state, a petition for the appointment of a guardian or protective order is not pending in a court of that state or another significant-connection state, and, before the court makes the appointment or issues the order:

      1. 1. A petition for an appointment or order is not filed in the home state of the respondent;
      2. 2. An objection to the jurisdiction of the court is not filed by a person required to be notified of the proceeding; and
      3. 3. The court concludes that the court is an appropriate forum under the factors set forth in § 13.5-204 of this subtitle;

3. (3)

   1. (i) This State does not have jurisdiction under item (1) or (2) of this subsection; and

   2. (ii) The home state of the respondent and all significant-connection states have declined to exercise jurisdiction because:

      1. 1. This State is the more appropriate forum; and
      2. 2. Jurisdiction in this State is consistent with the constitutions of this State and the United States; or
4. (4) The requirements for special jurisdiction under § 13.5-202 of this subtitle are met.

A court of this State has jurisdiction to appoint a guardian or issue a protective order for a respondent if:

Added by Acts 2010, c. 256, § 1, eff. Oct. 1, 2010; Acts 2010, c. 257, § 1, eff. Oct. 1, 2010.