Ind. Admin. Code tit. 327, r. 2-1-8.9
Authority: IC 13-14-8; IC 13-14-9; IC 13-18-3
Affected: IC 13-15-4-1; IC 13-18-4
Sec. 8.9. (a) Site-specific modifications to criteria must be protective of designated uses and aquatic life or human health. In addition, any site-specific modifications that result in less stringent criteria must be based on a sound scientific rationale and shall not be likely to jeopardize the continued existence of endangered or threatened species listed or proposed under Section 4 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) or result in the destruction or adverse modification of the species' critical habitats. More stringent modifications shall be developed to protect endangered or threatened species listed or proposed under Section 4 of the ESA, where the modifications are necessary to ensure that water quality is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of the species or result in the destruction or adverse modification of the species' critical habitats. More stringent modifications may also be developed to protect candidate (C1) species being considered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) for listing under Section 4 of the ESA, where the modifications are necessary to protect the species. Criteria may be modified on a site-specific basis to reflect local environmental conditions as restricted by the following provisions:
(1) Aquatic life criteria may be modified on a site-specific basis as follows:
(B) Less stringent site-specific modifications to chronic or acute aquatic life criteria may be developed when either of the following conditions applies:
(D) Any modifications to protect threatened or endangered aquatic species required by this subsection may be accomplished using either of the following procedures:
(2) Human health criteria may be modified on a site-specific basis as follows:
(A) To provide an additional level of protection in accordance with the following:
(b) The application requirements for site-specific modifications to criteria allowed under subsection (a) are as follows:
(2) Applications for site-specific modifications to criteria allowed under subsection (a)(1)(B)(ii) and determined using the recalculation procedure under section 13 of this rule shall include the following:
(B) A list of all aquatic plant, invertebrate, amphibian, and fish species that are critical species at the site, including all species that:
(c) Upon receipt of an application for a site-specific modification to a criterion, the commissioner shall do the following:
(1) For a site-specific modification listed under subsection (d):
(2) For a site-specific modification not listed under subsection (d):
(d) Site-specific modifications to criteria do not require a rulemaking if they are:
(1) allowed under:
(e) Upon approval of a site-specific modification listed in subsection (d), the commissioner shall do the following:
(f) Site-specific modifications to criteria specifically listed in this rule, except for site-specific modifications to criteria:
shall not be incorporated into a final NPDES permit or used for other Clean Water Act purposes until approved by U.S. EPA.
(g) The following site-specific modifications to water quality criteria have been granted:
| Table 8.9-1 |
| Site-Specific Surface Water Quality Criteria[1] |
| Waterbody | Starting Location | Ending Location | Substances | AAC (Maximum) (μg/l) | AAC Conversion Factors | CAC (4-Day Average) (μg/l) | CAC Conversion Factors |
| Richland Creek | The outfall of the Princeton POTW | The confluence of Richland Creek with McCarty Ditch | Copper (Dissolved) | WER[2](e(0.9422 [1n(hardness)]-1.4076)) | 0.960 | WER[2](e(0.8545 [1n(hardness)]-1.4097)) | 0.960 |
| Cyanide (Free) | 45.8 | 10.7 | |||||
| Lead (Dissolved) | WER[2](e(1.273 [1n(hardness)]-1.2554)) | 1.46203-[(ln hardness)(0.145712)] | WER[2](e(1.273 [1n(hardness)]-3.7561)) | 1.46203-[(ln hardness)(0.145712)] | |||
| Wabash River | The outfall of the Bluegrass Mills Holdings Company (river mile 387) | A point two (2) miles downstream | Cyanide (Free) | 45.8 | 10.7 | ||
| Wabash River | The outfall of Eli-Lilly and Company (river mile 309) | A point two (2) miles downstream | Copper (Dissolved) | WER[2](e(0.9422 [1n(hardness)]-1.4076)) | 0.960 | WER[2](e(0.8545 [1n(hardness)]-1.4097)) | 0.960 |
| Wabash River | The outfall of Eli-Lilly and Company (river mile 236) | A point two (2) miles downstream | Lead (Dissolved) | WER[2](e(1.273 [1n(hardness)]-1.2554)) | 1.46203-[(ln hardness)(0.145712)] | WER[2](e(1.273 [1n(hardness)]-3.7561)) | 1.46203-[(ln hardness)(0.145712)] |
| West Fork White River | The outfall of the Belmont POTW (river mile 227) | The Marion-Johnson County line (river mile 220) | |||||
| Copper (Dissolved) | WER[2](e(0.9422 [1n(hardness)]-1.4076)) | 0.960 | WER[2](e(0.8545 [1n(hardness)]-1.4097)) | 0.960 | |||
| Cyanide (Free) | 45.8 | 10.7 | |||||
| Lead (Dissolved) | WER[2](e(1.273 [1n(hardness)]-1.2554)) | 1.46203-[(ln hardness)(0.145712)] | WER[2](e(1.273 [1n(hardness)]-3.7561)) | 1.46203-[(ln hardness)(0.145712)] | |||
| [1] The AAC and CAC columns of this table contain hardness-based total recoverable metals criteria for copper and lead. The criterion for the dissolved metal is calculated by multiplying the appropriate conversion factor by the AAC or CAC. This dissolved AAC or CAC shall be rounded to two (2) significant digits, except when the criteria are used as intermediate values in a calculation, such as in the calculation of water quality-based effluent limitations (WQBELs). | |||||||
| [2] A value of one (1) shall be used for the water-effect ratio (WER) unless an alternate value is established under this section. | |||||||
(Water Pollution Control Division; 327 IAC 2-1-8.9; filed Feb 14, 2005, 10:05 a.m.: 28 IR 2058; errata filed Jul 6, 2005, 3:12 p.m.: 28 IR 3582; filed Mar 21, 2007, 2:51 p.m.: 20070418-IR-327060181FRA; readopted filed Oct 18, 2024, 1:57 p.m.: 20241113-IR-327230810RFA)