- (a) Except as provided in subsection (d), the owner of a motor vehicle identified through a worksite speed control system is liable for the civil penalty described in section 18 of this chapter for exceeding a worksite speed limit.
- (b) There is a rebuttable presumption that the owner of a motor vehicle that is the subject of a photograph or recorded image was operating the motor vehicle when the photograph or recorded image was obtained through a worksite speed control system.
- (c) The presumption under subsection (b) does not apply to an owner of a motor vehicle that is a motor vehicle rental company.
- (d) The owner of a motor vehicle may submit information as determined by the department to rebut the presumption created by subsection (b).
(e) It is a defense under this section if any of the following apply:
(1) The person receiving a notice of violation issued pursuant to this chapter:
- (A) was not the owner of the motor vehicle; or
(B) was not driving the motor vehicle;
at the time that the worksite speed limit was exceeded.
- (2) The vehicle was reported stolen prior to the time that the worksite speed limit was exceeded and was not recovered prior to that time.
- (3) The worksite speed control system was not properly tested for accuracy, certification, or calibration.
- (4) Workers were not present in the worksite at the time that the worksite speed limit was exceeded.
As added by P.L.120-2023, SEC.2.