Ind. Code § 8-1-2-101
(a) Every municipal council or county executive shall have power:
(4) The power and authority granted in this section shall exist and be vested in said municipalities or county executives, anything in this chapter to the contrary notwithstanding.
Provided, however, whenever, after a request by petition in writing of any public utility, department of public utilities, the city, or other political subdivision or other body, having jurisdiction of the matter, shall refuse or fail, for a period of thirty (30) days, to give or grant to such public utility or department of public utilities permission and authority to construct, maintain, and operate any additional construction, equipment, or facility, reasonably necessary for the transaction of the business of such public utility or department of public utilities and for the public convenience or interest, then such public utility or department of public utilities may file a petition with said commission for such right and permission, which petition shall state, with particularity, the construction, equipment, or other facility desired to be constructed and operated, and show a reasonable public necessity therefor, and also the failure or refusal of such city, political subdivision, or other body to give or grant such right or permission; and the commission shall thereupon give notice of the pendency of such petition, together with a copy thereof, to such city or other political subdivision or body, and of the time and place of hearing of the matter set forth in such petition; and such commission shall have power to hear and determine such matters and to give or grant such right and permission and to impose such conditions in relation thereto as the necessity of such public utility or department of public utilities and the public convenience and interest may reasonably require. Provided, further, that when the relocation by a public utility or department of public utilities of any of its construction, equipment, or facility located within the corporate limits of two (2) or more adjoining cities is reasonably necessary for the public convenience or interest, and any or either of said cities fail or refuse to give or grant to such public utility or department of public utilities permission and authority to relocate such construction, equipment, or facility, any municipality which has given or granted to such public utility or department of public utilities permission and authority to relocate such construction, equipment, and facility, the public utility or department of public utilities may file a petition with said commission for such right and permission to which petition the city or cities failing or refusing to give or grant the same shall be made a respondent, and such public utility or department of public utilities if not the petitioner shall also be made a respondent, and said commission shall have power to hear and determine such matter and to give or grant such right and permission and to impose such conditions in relation thereto as the public convenience and interest may reasonably require; and if said commission shall give or grant such right and permission, no further public authority to make such relocation as authorized or to go on any street, alley, road, or highway in said city or cities necessary to be used therefor shall be required of said public utility or department of public utilities. All orders entered before June 30, 1931, by the commission in cases within the provisions of this section are hereby declared legal and valid.
(b) Subject to the commission's authority under subsection (a)(1) with respect to an unreasonable ordinance or other determination, the municipality or county executive may operate and maintain the streets, highways, and other public property in the municipality or county for the safety of the traveling public, and a municipality or county executive may manage the public right-of-way or require by ordinance fair and reasonable compensation on a competitively neutral and nondiscriminatory basis for occupation of the public right-of-way on a nondiscriminatory basis, including occupation by the municipality or county executive, if the compensation required is publicly disclosed by the municipality or county executive. Fair and reasonable compensation may not exceed the municipality's or county executive's direct, actual, and reasonably incurred costs of managing the public right-of-way caused by the public utility's or department of public utilities' occupancy. The management costs, which the municipality or county executive shall assign individually to the public utility or department of public utilities creating the management costs, must be limited to the direct, actual, and reasonably incurred costs a municipality or county incurs in managing the public right-of-way. As used in this section, the term "management costs" includes but is not limited to the costs to the municipality or county of the following:
(6) Management costs associated with the implementation of an ordinance adopted under this section.
However, as used in this section, direct, actual, and reasonably incurred management costs do not include rents, franchise fees, or any other payment by a public utility or department of public utilities for occupation of the public right-of-way. As used in this section, the term "public right-of-way" does not include the airwaves above the streets, highways, or other public property within the municipality or county as those airwaves are used for cellular or other nonwire telecommunications or broadcast service.
(d) Nothing in this section may be construed to affect franchise agreements between a cable company and a municipality or county.
Formerly: Acts 1913, c.76, s.110; Acts 1931, c.126, s.1. As amended by P.L.59-1984, SEC.42; P.L.127-1998, SEC.1.