Ill. Admin. Code tit. 77, § 1110.230
a) Introduction
1) This Section applies to projects involving the In-Center Hemodialysis category of service. Applicants proposing to establish, expand or modernize this category of service shall comply with the applicable subsections of this Section as follows:
| PROJECT TYPE | REQUIRED REVIEW CRITERIA | ||
| Establishment of Services or Facility | (b)(1) | − | Planning Area Need – 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100 (formula calculation) |
| (b)(2) | − | Planning Area Need – Service to Planning Area Residents | |
| (b)(3) | − | Planning Area Need – Service Demand − Establishment of In-Center Hemodialysis | |
| (b)(5) | − | Planning Area Need − Service Accessibility | |
| (c)(1) | − | Unnecessary Duplication of Services | |
| (c)(2) | − | Maldistribution | |
| (c)(3) | − | Impact of Project on Other Area Providers | |
| (e) | − | Staffing | |
| (f) | − | Support Services | |
| (g) | − | Minimum Number of Stations | |
| (h) | − | Continuity of Care | |
| (i) | − | Relocation (if applicable) | |
| (j) | − | Assurances | |
| Expansion of Existing Services | (b)(2) | − | Planning Area Need – Service to Planning Area Residents |
| (b)(4) | − | Planning Area Need – Service Demand – Expansion of In-Center Hemodialysis | |
| (e) | − | Staffing − Availability | |
| (f) | − | Support Services | |
| (j) | − | Assurances | |
| In-Center Hemodialysis Modernization | (d)(1) | − | Deteriorated Facilities |
| (d)(2) & (3) | − | Documentation | |
| (f) | − | Support Services |
b) Planning Area Need − Review Criterion
1) 77 Ill. Adm. Code 1100
2) Service to Planning Area Residents
3) Service Demand – Establishment of In-Center Hemodialysis Service
A) Historical Referrals
B) Projected Referrals
The applicant shall provide physician referral letters that attest to:
The number of stations proposed to establish a new in-center hemodialysis service is necessary to accommodate the service demand experienced annually by the existing applicant facility over the latest 2-year period, as evidenced by historical and projected referrals, or, if the applicant proposes to establish a new facility, the applicant shall submit projected referrals. The applicant shall document subsection (b)(3)(A) and either subsection (b)(3)(B) or (C).
The applicant shall document that the number of stations to be established or added is necessary to serve the planning area's population, based on the following:
C) Projected Service Demand − Based on Rapid Population Growth
4) Service Demand – Expansion of In-Center Hemodialysis Service
A) Historical Service Demand
B) Projected Referrals
i) The applicant shall provide physician letters that attest to:
• the physician's total number of patients (by facility and zip code of residence) who have received care at existing facilities located in the area, as reported to The Renal Network at the end of the year for the most recent 3 years and the end of the most recent quarter;
• the number of new patients (by facility and zip code of residence) located in the area, as reported to The Renal Network, that the physician referred for in-center hemodialysis for the most recent year;
• an estimated number of patients (transfers from existing facilities and pre-ESRD, as well as respective zip codes of residence) that the physician will refer annually to the applicant's facility within a 24-month period after project completion, based upon the physician's practice experience. The anticipated number of referrals cannot exceed the physician's documented historical caseload. The percentage of project referrals used to justify the proposed expansion cannot exceed the historical percentage of applicant market share, within a 24-month period after project completion;
C) Projected Service Demand – Based on Rapid Population Growth
If a projected demand for service is based upon rapid population growth in the applicant facility's existing market area (as experienced annually within the latest 24-month period), the projected service demand shall be determined as follows:
The number of stations to be added for each category of service is necessary to reduce the facility's experienced high utilization and to meet a projected demand for service. The applicant shall document subsection (b)(4)(A) and either (b)(4)(B) or (C):
5) Service Accessibility
A) Service Restrictions
iii) Restrictive admission policies of existing providers;
The applicant shall document that at least one of the following factors exists in the planning area:
B) Supporting Documentation
iv) A certification of waiting times;
C) The travel radius for purposes of subsection (b)(5)(A)(v) is:
The applicant shall provide the following documentation concerning existing restrictions to service access:
The number of stations being established or added for the subject category of service is necessary to improve access for planning area residents. The applicant shall document the following:
If a projected demand for service is based upon rapid population growth in the applicant facility's existing market area (as experienced annually within the latest 24-month period), the projected service demand shall be determined as follows:
c) Unnecessary Duplication/Maldistribution − Review Criterion
1) The applicant shall document that the project will not result in an unnecessary duplication. The applicant shall provide the following information:
2) The applicant shall document that the project will not result in maldistribution of services. Maldistribution exists when the identified area (within the planning area) has an excess supply of facilities, stations and services characterized by such factors as, but not limited to:
3) The applicant shall document that, within 24 months after project completion, the proposed project:
4) The travel radius for purposes of subsection (c)(1) is:
d) Category of Service Modernization
B) Non-compliance with licensing or life safety codes;
2) Documentation shall include the most recent:
A) IDPH CMMS inspection reports; and
e) Staffing
1) Qualifications
2) Documentation shall consist of:
A) Medical Director
Curriculum vitae of Medical Director, including a list of all in-center hemodialysis facilities where the position of Medical Director is held.
B) All Other Personnel
A narrative explanation of how positions will be filled.
3) Training
The applicant proposing to establish an in-center hemodialysis category of service shall document that an ongoing program of training in dialysis techniques for nurses and technicians will be provided at the facility.
4) Staffing Plan
5) Medical Staff
The applicant shall provide a letter certifying whether the facility will or will not maintain an open medical staff.
The applicant proposing to establish an in-center hemodialysis category of service shall document that at least one RN will be on duty when the unit is in operation and will maintain a ratio of at least one direct patient care provider to every 4 patients.
The applicant shall document that relevant clinical and professional staffing needs for the proposed project were considered and that licensure and The Joint Commission staffing requirements can be met. In addition, the applicant shall document that necessary staffing is available by providing letters of interest from prospective staff members, completed applications for employment, or a narrative explanation of how the proposed staffing will be achieved.
f) Support Services – Review Criterion
1) Participation in a dialysis data system;
An applicant proposing to establish an in-center hemodialysis category of service must submit a certification from an authorized representative that attests to each of the following:
g) Minimum Number of Stations
The minimum number of in-center hemodialysis stations for an End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) facility is:
h) Continuity of Care
An applicant proposing to establish an in-center hemodialysis category of service shall document that a signed, written affiliation agreement or arrangement is in effect for the provision of inpatient care and other hospital services. Documentation shall consist of copies of all such agreements.
i) Relocation of Facilities – Review Criterion
This criterion may only be used to justify the relocation of a facility from one location in the planning area to another in the same planning area and may not be used to justify any additional stations. A request for relocation of a facility requires the discontinuation of the current category of service at the existing site and the establishment of a new category of service at the proposed location. The applicant shall document the following:
j) Assurances
2) An applicant proposing to expand or relocate in-center hemodialysis stations will achieve and maintain compliance with the following adequacy of hemodialysis outcome measures for the latest 12-month period for which data are available:
≥ 85% of hemodialysis patient population achieves urea reduction ratio (URR) ≥ 65% and ≥ 85% of hemodialysis patient population achieves Kt/V Daugirdas II 1.2.
The applicant representative who signs the CON application shall submit a signed and dated statement attesting to the applicant's understanding that: