Ill. Admin. Code tit. 1, § 220.EXHIBIT A
State Mandates Act Questionnaire
| Agency: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Part/Title: | ( | Ill. Adm. Code | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Illinois Register Citation: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 1. | Does this rulemaking affect any of the following: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Municipality | Other Unit of Local Govt. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| County | School District | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Township | Community College Dist. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2. | Does this rule require any of the above entities to establish, expand or modify its activities in such a way as to necessitate additional expenditures from local revenues? | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Yes | No | Number of units affected | |||||||||||||||||||
| If yes, please estimate the amount of additional expenditures necessitated by this | |||||||||||||||||||||
| rulemaking per unit of government: | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Note: If the dollar amount, or total number of units affected is unknown, please outline and attach to this form an explanation of the steps taken by the agency to determine the approximate expense of the rulemaking, and the number of units affected. | |||||||||||||||||||||
| If no, please explain why the rule does not necessitate such additional expenditures. | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 3. | Were any alternatives that do not necessitate additional expenditures considered? | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Yes | No | ||||||||||||||||||||
| If yes, please list these alternatives and explain why they were rejected. | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 4. | What are the policy objectives of the rulemaking? (Please be specific) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 5. | Please explain why the policy objectives of this rule cannot be achieved in the absence of the rule or through a rule that does not create a State Mandate. | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Source: Amended at 18 Ill. Reg. 4758, effective March 14, 1994)