Haw. Rev. Stat. § 668-7
[(a)] The court shall have power, subject to section 668-8.5:
(7) To exercise any other power pertaining to a circuit court in a civil action.
[(b)] When partition of two or more separate tracts or parcels of land is sought, the whole share of any party in all of them may be set apart to the party in any one or more of the tracts or parcels. Any plan for a subdivision shall, before approval of the court, be subject to approval by the planning department of any county having laws and regulations covering subdivisions, applicable thereto. If action by the planning department on the proposed subdivision is unreasonably delayed, the court may order the planning department to appear and show cause why the subdivision should not be approved by the court.
[L 1923, c 178, §7; RL 1925, §2767; RL 1935, §4746; am L 1939, c 242, §9; RL 1945, §12456; am L 1949, c 222, §12; RL 1955, §337-7; HRS §668-7; am L 1972, c 90, §11(f) to (j); gen ch 1985]
Demand for jury trial when title controverted, see §668-8.
Enforcement of judgment, see HRCP rule 70.
Improvements made by one of the cotenants considered. 10 H. 662 (1897).
Sale of land, power to order. 37 H. 74 (1945), aff'd 158 F.2d 122 (1946).
Right of allotment of grantee of cotenant where grantee has made improvements. 48 H. 92, 97, 395 P.2d 620 (1964).
Power of court to order sale of property. 56 H. 171, 532 P.2d 657 (1975).
Allotment of a parcel to a cotenant other than that which the cotenant occupied and improved upheld. 57 H. 510, 559 P.2d 739 (1977).
Partition of real property in kind upheld. 57 H. 510, 559 P.2d 739 (1977).
Where trial court applied its equitable power in finding that property should be consolidated and subdivided into two lots, it did not disregard paragraph (4); this section does not require a trial court to partition property according to each parties' proportionate interest because a party so requests. 106 H. 501, 107 P.3d 430 (2005).
A court in equity, in a partition action not involving ouster or agreement, has the discretionary authority to allow an apportioned defensive rental offset against maintenance-related and improvement-related contributions, to the extent that the "reasonable rental value of the use of the property by the cotenant in possession of property has exceeded his or her proportionate share of ownership". 123 H. 301 (App.), 234 P.3d 683 (2010).
Cited: 31 H. 817, 819 (1931).
See 34 H. 686 (1938); 35 H. 262 (1939).