Haw. Rev. Stat. § 663-17
(b) A pleader may either:
(2) Move for judgment for contribution against any other joint judgment debtor, where in a single action a judgment has been entered against joint tortfeasors, one of whom has discharged the judgment by payment or has paid more than the joint tortfeasor's pro rata share thereof.
If relief can be obtained as provided in this subsection, no independent action shall be maintained to enforce the claim for contribution.
[L 1941, c 24, §7; RL 1945, §10493; RL 1955, §246-16; HRS §663-17; am L 1972, c 144, §2(h); gen ch 1985; am L 1999, c 237, § 2; am L 2016, c 55, §47]
In subsection (c), "the last paragraph of section 663-12" changed to "section 663-12(d)" pursuant to §23G-15.
Third party practice, see HRCP rule 14; DCRCP rule 14. Counterclaims, cross-claims, see HRCP rule 13; DCRCP rule 13.
The Requirement for Notice of Claim Against the City and County of Honolulu: Does it Apply to a Claim for Contribution under the Uniform Contribution Among Tortfeasors Act? 3 HBJ, no. 1, at 4 (1965).
Presentation of claim against county within six-month period provided by §46-72 not a condition precedent to maintaining third party action against county for contribution. 283 F. Supp. 854 (1968).
Right of contribution, when it becomes enforceable. 283 F. Supp. 854 (1968).
Cited, where a defendant filed a motion for summary judgment against plaintiff's claims and filed cross-claims against co-defendants, who filed an opposition to the motion, but did not file a cross-claim against the defendant, and plaintiff filed a statement of no position regarding the motion; the court found the right of the co-defendants to oppose the motion was sustainable under the Uniform Contribution Among Tortfeasors Act and HRCP rule 15(b). 415 F. Supp. 2d 1163 (2006).
Minor son of plaintiff may be subject to contribution to defendant as joint tortfeasor. 51 H. 74, 450 P.2d 998 (1969).
Parents are liable for torts to their minor children, and they may be joined as joint tortfeasors in action by children against third party. 51 H. 484, 462 P.2d 1007 (1969).
Plaintiff's wife may be impleaded by defendant, notwithstanding the interspousal tort immunity law. 68 H. 505, 720 P.2d 181 (1986).
Based on §663-12 and subsection (c), because joint tortfeasor landlord did not file a cross-claim against joint tortfeasor tenant, landlord did not have a right of contribution from tenant, and trial court properly acted within its discretion in dismissing tenant from the case. 93 H. 417, 5 P.3d 407 (2000).
Where bar owners failed to litigate the issue of proportionate fault with bar customer by pleading the customer into the case by filing a third-party complaint against the customer pursuant to §663-12, under subsection (c), the bar owners were barred from having "the relative degrees of fault of the joint tortfeasors considered in determining their pro rata shares"; thus, because the customer could not have been included on the special verdict form as a matter of law, the appeals court erred in concluding to the contrary. 118 H. 385, 191 P.3d 1062 (2008).