Part heading amended by L 2017, c 170, §2.
Medical cannabis; economic and other data; collection, see §201-13.9.
Medical cannabis; tenant use; eviction, see §521-39.
Medical cannabis testing and research programs, see §304A-1865.
Gonzales v. Raich: How the Medical Marijuana Debate Invoked Commerce Clause Confusion. 28 UH L. Rev. 261 (2005).
The "Grande Iced Nonfat Chai with a Shot of Espresso" Problem: Dealing with Designer Drugs in the Wake of McFadden v. United States. 39 UH L. Rev. 265 (2016).
District court erred in re-determining the fact of medical use in contrast to the parties' stipulation that petitioner possessed and transported medical marijuana under a valid Medical Marijuana Registry Patient Identification Certificate, thus preempting consideration of petitioner's affirmative defense; given that the State presented no evidence showing that the marijuana was for any other use other than a medical use, petitioner proved that petitioner was authorized to possess marijuana for medical purposes pursuant to this part for purposes of an affirmative defense under §712-1240.1(2). 129 H. 397, 301 P.3d 607 (2013).