Haw. Rev. Stat. § 291D-3
(b) Where a defendant is charged with a traffic infraction, an emergency period infraction, or a fireworks infraction and the infraction is committed in the same course of conduct as a criminal offense for which the offender is arrested or charged, the traffic infraction, emergency period infraction, or fireworks infraction shall be adjudicated pursuant to this chapter; provided that the court may schedule any initial appearance, hearing, or trial on the traffic infraction, emergency period infraction, or fireworks infraction at the same date, time, and place as the arraignment, hearing, or trial on the related criminal offense.
Notwithstanding this subsection and subsection (c), the court shall not schedule any initial appearance, hearing, or trial on the traffic infraction, emergency period infraction, or fireworks infraction at the same date, time, and place as the arraignment, hearing, or trial on the related criminal offense where the related criminal offense is a felony or is a misdemeanor for which the defendant has demanded a jury trial.
(c) If the defendant requests a trial pursuant to section 291D-13, the trial shall be held in the district court of the circuit in which the traffic infraction, emergency period infraction, or fireworks infraction was committed. If the court schedules a concurrent trial pursuant to paragraph (1), the concurrent trial shall be held in the appropriate district or family court of the circuit in which the traffic infraction, emergency period infraction, or fireworks infraction was committed, whichever has jurisdiction over the related criminal offense charged pursuant to the applicable statute or rule of court; provided that:
(2) If trial on the traffic infraction, emergency period infraction, or fireworks infraction is held separately from and before trial on any related criminal offense, the following shall be inadmissible in the prosecution or trial of the related criminal offense, except as expressly provided by the Hawaii rules of evidence:
(B) Any testimony given by the defendant in the trial on the traffic infraction, emergency period infraction, or fireworks infraction.
These statements or testimony shall not be deemed a waiver of the defendant's privilege against self-incrimination in connection with any related criminal offense.
(e) If the defendant fails to appear at any scheduled court date before the date of trial or concurrent trial and:
[L 1993, c 214, pt of §2; am L 1997, c 59, §1; am L 2005, c 48, §1; am L 2007, c 85, §3; am L 2021, c 185, §6; am L 2025, c 243, §20]
Applicability of rules, see HCTR rule 4; companion cases, see HCTR rule 12.
Under the plain language of subsection (d), judgment entered against defendant for non-criminal speeding infraction did not preclude the State from prosecuting defendant for the related criminal offense of excessive speeding. Moreover, subsection (d) plainly applied to permit prosecution of a criminal offense where the adjudicated traffic infraction was a lesser included traffic infraction of the charged crime. 136 H. 181 (App.), 358 P.3d 750 (2015).