Haw. Rev. Stat. § 291C-12.6
[L 1992, c 243, §2; am L 2002, c 160, §9; am L 2008, c 231, §9; am L 2021, c 124, §4]
Charges against defendant for accidents involving bodily injury and driving without a license were insufficient for failing to allege a mens rea and, therefore, were subject to dismissal without prejudice. 134 H. 465 (App.), 342 P.3d 884 (2015).
When viewed in the light most favorable to the State, there was sufficient evidence to show that defendant acted with at least a reckless state of mind regarding whether defendant had been "involved in an accident resulting in bodily injury to any person", where the evidence showed: (1) defendant struck complaining witness twice when defendant backed vehicle into complaining witness; (2) defendant's vehicle hit complaining witness on the side of complaining witness' leg and knee; (3) complaining witness' friend confronted defendant about hitting complaining witness; and (4) complaining witness experienced physical pain and was taken to the hospital. 134 H. 465 (App.), 342 P.3d 884 (2015).