Haw. Rev. Stat. § 266-2
(a) The department of transportation shall:
(3) Subject to all applicable provisions of law, have the power to fix and regulate from time to time rates and charges for:
(b) Notwithstanding any law or provision to the contrary, the department of transportation is authorized to plan, construct, operate, and maintain any commercial harbor facility in the State, including, but not limited to, the acquisition and use of lands necessary to stockpile dredged spoils, without the approval of county agencies.
All moneys appropriated for commercial harbor improvements, including new construction, reconstruction, repairs, salaries, and operating expenses, shall be expended under the supervision and control of the department, subject to this chapter and chapter 103D.
All contracts and agreements authorized by law to be entered into by the department shall be executed on its behalf by the director of transportation.
[L 1911, c 163, §3; am L 1913, c 150, §1; am L 1915, c 169, §2; ratified, March 28, 1916, c 54, 39 Stat 39; am imp July 9, 1921, c 42, §315, 42 Stat 120; 48 U.S.C. §545; RL 1925, §834; RL 1935, §1732; RL 1945, §4983; RL 1955, §112-3; am L Sp 1959 2d, c 1, §26; am imp L 1961, c 42, §1; HRS §266-2; am L 1978, c 231, §3; am L 1980, c 161, §2; am L 1991, c 34, §1 and c 272, §9; am L Sp 1993, c 8, §54]
Regulation of pilots, see chapter 462A.
Expenditures for produce refrigeration systems at harbors are for a public purpose. Att. Gen. Op. 62-12.
Power to impose and collect tolls and tonnage charges. 31 H. 372 (1930).
Power to contract, etc.: limitation on power of board to bind the State. 43 H. 28 (1958).
Where the department of transportation's (DOT) governing statutes did not explicitly or implicitly authorize the DOT to issue administrative rules exonerating the State from the negligence of its employees, Hawaii administrative rule §19-41-7 did not bear a reasonable relationship to the DOT's statutory mandate, and the legislature's imposition of a statutory duty to defend and/or indemnify in other circumstances demonstrated the legislature's clear intent to reserve such power to itself, trial court erred in obligating appellants to defend and indemnify the State against injured plaintiff's claims. 111 H. 144, 140 P.3d 377 (2006).