Fla. Stat. § 341.051
(1) FEDERAL AID.--
(2) PUBLIC TRANSIT PLAN.--
(3) APPROPRIATION REQUESTS.--
(4) PROJECT ELIGIBILITY.--
(a) Any project that is necessary to meet the program objectives enumerated in s. 341.041, that conforms to the provisions of this section, and that is contained in the local transportation improvement program and the adopted work program of the department is eligible for the expenditure of state funds for transit purposes.
1. The project shall be a project for service or transportation facilities provided by the department under the provisions of this act, a public transit capital project, a commuter assistance project, a public transit service development project, or a transit corridor project.
2. The project must be approved by the department as being consistent with the criteria established pursuant to the provisions of this act.
(c) Unless otherwise authorized by the Legislature, the department is prohibited from entering into any agreement or contract for a public transit project which would result in the ultimate expenditure or commitment of state funds in excess of $5 million.
1(5) FUND PARTICIPATION; CAPITAL ASSISTANCE.--
(b) The Department of Transportation shall develop a major capital investment policy which shall include policy criteria and guidelines for the expenditure or commitment of state funds for public transit capital projects. The policy shall include the following:
1. Methods to be used to determine consistency of a transit project with the approved local government comprehensive plans of the units of local government in which the project is located.
2. Methods for evaluating the level of local commitment to a transit project, which is to be demonstrated through system planning and the development of a feasible plan to fund operating cost through fares, value capture techniques such as joint development and special districts, or other local funding mechanisms.
3. Methods for evaluating alternative transit systems including an analysis of technology and alternative methods for providing transit services in the corridor. The department shall present such investment policy to both the Senate Transportation Committee and the House Public Transportation Committee along with recommended legislation by March 1, 1991.
(f) The department is authorized to fund up to 50 percent of the capital and net operating costs of transit service development projects that are local in scope and that will improve system efficiencies, ridership, or revenues. All such projects shall be identified in the appropriation request of the department through a specific program of projects, as provided for in s. 341.041, that is selectively applied in the following functional areas and is subject to the specified times of duration:
1. Improving system operations, including, but not limited to, realigning route structures, increasing system average speed, decreasing deadhead mileage, expanding area coverage, and improving schedule adherence, for a period of up to 3 years;
2. Improving system maintenance procedures, including, but not limited to, effective preventive maintenance programs, improved mechanics training programs, decreasing service repair calls, decreasing parts inventory requirements, and decreasing equipment downtime, for a period of up to 3 years;
3. Improving marketing and consumer information programs, including, but not limited to, automated information services, organized advertising and promotion programs, and signing of designated stops, for a period of up to 2 years; and
4. Improving technology involved in overall operations, including, but not limited to, transit equipment, fare collection techniques, electronic data processing applications, and bus locators, for a period of up to 2 years. The term "net operating costs" means all operating costs of a project less any federal funds, fares, or other sources of income to the project.
1Note.--Section 57, ch. 95-257, purported to amend paragraphs (a) and (c) of subsection (5) but did not set out in full the amended subsection to include flush left language at the end of the paragraphs. In the absence of affirmative evidence that the Legislature intended to repeal the omitted material, it is set out in full here, pending clarification by the Legislature.
History.--s. 1, ch. 78-283; s. 63, ch. 83-3; ss. 9, 13, ch. 83-138; s. 254, ch. 84-309; s. 5, ch. 84-340; s. 18, ch. 87-225; s. 20, ch. 88-286; s. 17, ch. 89-301; s. 82, ch. 90-136; s. 67, ch. 92-152; s. 21, ch. 92-173; s. 36, ch. 93-164; s. 57, ch. 95-257.