Fla. Admin. Code R. 62-41.304
(1) Priority List. Prior to submittal to the Department for approval pursuant to Section 373.042(3), F.S., each District proposing a Minimum Flow or Minimum Water Level (MFL) or Reservation in the Central Florida Water Initiative (CFWI) Area shall:
(2) Consistent Method for Establishing MFLs.
(3) Status of the MFL Waterbody. When determining whether the flow(s) and/or level(s) of a specific MFL water body are below or projected to fall below the adopted MFL criteria, the District within which the MFL is located shall use the status assessment approach that includes a screening level analysis and a causation analysis, when applicable pursuant to the paragraphs 62-41.304(3)(a)-(c), F.A.C. This status assessment is independent from and not a determination of consumptive use permit compliance or environmental resource permit compliance. Permit compliance is a regulatory function that is not within the scope of this subsection.
(c) If the screening level analysis indicates that the MFL is not being met, or is trending toward not being met based on the flows and levels adjusted by rainfall trends, the District will conduct a causation analysis to independently evaluate the potential impacts of various stressors on the MFL water body being assessed.
1. Factors other than consumptive uses of water (e.g., long-term drought) can cause the flow or level of a surface watercourse, aquifer, surface water, or spring to drop below an adopted minimum flow or level. The factors to be considered in the determination of causation shall be based on the use of best professional judgment and may include:
a. Rainfall or other climatic variables;
b. Consumptive use;
c. Land use changes or development;
d. Surface water drainage;
e. Changes in hydrology and hydraulics;
f. Geology/hydromorphology (e.g., sinkhole formation);
g. Water levels/flows in other appropriate water resources (e.g., nearby wells, lakes, streams, wetlands);
h. Ecological assessment information; and,
i. Other factors that can be reasonably shown to cause a change in the flow or level.
2. The tools used in the causation analysis shall be based on the use of best professional judgment and may include:
a. Double-mass analyses;
b. Statistical analysis of climate variables and flow and/or water level;
c. Stage and/or flow duration and frequency analysis;
d. Modeling (groundwater/surface water, ecological or water budget models);
e. Ecological tools;
f. Distribution of groundwater use and withdrawal rate history;
g. Aquifer water level trend analysis; and
h. Degree of aquifer confinement.
3. Based on the causation analysis, the District shall develop or amend a recovery or prevention strategy including any applicable rulemaking, as appropriate, consistent with the provisions of Section 373.0421(2), F.S.
(4) Development of MFL Recovery and Prevention Strategies.
(5) Consistent Method to Set Reservations.
Rulemaking Authority 373.043, 373.0465, 373.171 FS. Law Implemented 373.016, 373.019, 373.026, 373.036, 373.0363, 373.042, 373.0421, 373.0465, 373.171, 373.219, 373.223, 373.233, 373.229, 373.709 FS. History–New 6-21-21.