Fla. Admin. Code R. 61G7-5.0034
Section 468.530(3), F.S., provides that: “The board may not authorize the use of a name which is so similar to that of a public officer or agency, or of that held by another licensee, that the public may be confused or misled thereby.” Recognizing the existence and reasonable purpose of franchising and licensing agreements under which more than one company, corporation, or other entity may be entitled to use the name of the franchisor or licensor, the Board hereby sets the following standards for the use of names under a franchise or licensing agreement:
(1) When more than one licensee is entitled to and wishes to use the name of a franchisor or licensor in the name of an employee leasing company, the name of the franchisor or licensor must be set out so as to make it clear that the two or more employee leasing companies are distinct and separate entities. Examples of acceptable names are:
(b) XYZ Employee Leasing Company of North Florida.
The difference in names between two or more licensees entitled to use the name of a franchisor or licensor must be plainly different and the differences must indicate a distinction in location or some other clear distinction.
(6) The standards set out in this rule shall also apply to situations in which a group of unrelated companies wish to use a single name for marketing, and promotional or other cooperative purpose. Examples of acceptable names in this situation are:
Specific Authority 468.522, 468.525(3)(e) FS. Law Implemented 468.525(3)(e) FS. History–New 5-26-96, Amended 9-5-04.