The Council of the District of Columbia finds that:

1. (1) The District of Columbia delegated to the Metropolitan Police Department (“MPD”) the vital task of protecting the safety of persons and property in the District of Columbia. This task is difficult, dangerous, and sensitive.
2. (2) Most members of the MPD perform their duties with diligence, devotion, and sensitivity. From time to time, however, some members of the MPD do not act in accordance with the high standards of conduct that the people of the District of Columbia have a right to expect. On other occasions, honest misunderstandings arise between police officers and members of the public with whom they interact.
3. (3) Because police officers have been given extraordinary powers, it is essential that there be an effective and efficient system for reviewing their exercise of police powers. Further, it is essential that both police officers and members of the public have confidence that this system of review is fair and unbiased. Members of the public must be aware of this system and have easy access to its processes.
4. (3A) Not Funded.
5. (3B) Not Funded.
6. (4) The need for independent review of police activities is recognized across the nation. Effective independent review enhances communication and mutual understanding between the police and the community, reduces community tensions, deters police misconduct, and increases the public’s confidence in their police force.
7. (5) Some complaints against police officers involve serious charges requiring formal disciplinary proceedings. Many, though, can be resolved through conciliation, mediation, or other dispute resolution techniques. An effective and efficient review mechanism should encompass a variety of procedures for dealing with different complaints in an appropriate manner.

History

Mar. 26, 1999, D.C. Law 12-208, § 2, 45 DCR 8107

Apr. 21, 2023, D.C. Law 24-345, § 105(a)

Prior Codifications

1981 Ed., § 4-911.

Emergency Legislation

For temporary (90 days) creation of the Police Reform Commission, see § 122 of Comprehensive Policing and Justice Reform Second Emergency Amendment Act of 2020 (D.C. Act 23-336, July 22, 2020, 67 DCR 9148).

For temporary (90 days) creation of the Police Reform Commission, see § 2 of Police Reform Commission Extension Emergency Amendment Act of 2020 (D.C. Act 23-556, Dec. 26, 2020, 68 DCR 00226).

For temporary (90 days) creation of the Police Reform Commission, see § 2 of Police Reform Commission Extension Congressional Review Emergency Amendment Act of 2021 (D.C. Act 24-28, Feb. 27, 2021, 68 DCR 002631).

For temporary (90 days) creation of the Police Reform Commission, see § 122 of Comprehensive Policing and Justice Reform Emergency Amendment Act of 2021 (D.C. Act 24-76, May 3, 2021, 68 DCR 004935).

Temporary Legislation

For temporary (225 days) creation of the Police Reform Commission, see § 122 of Comprehensive Policing and Justice Reform Second Temporary Amendment Act of 2020 (D.C. Law 23-151, Dec. 3, 2020, 67 DCR 9920).

For temporary (225 days) creation of the Police Reform Commission, see § 2 of Police Reform Commission Extension Temporary Amendment Act of 2020 (D.C. Law 23-266, Mar. 16, 2021, 68 DCR 001240).

Applicability

Applicability of D.C. Law 24-345: § 301 of D.C. Law 24-345 provided that the change made to this section by § 105(a) of D.C. Law 24-345 is subject to the inclusion of the law’s fiscal effect in an approved budget and financial plan. Therefore that amendment has not been implemented.

Section 7097 of D.C. Law 25-50 amended section 301(a)(1) of D.C. Law 24-345 retaining the applicability provision impacting this section. Therefore the amendment of this section by section 105(a) of Law 24-345 still has not been implemented.