(b) As part of the grantee's preapplication submission required by § 1944.526(a)(2)(i), the grantee established the objectives of its TSA program including the estimated number of low-income families to be assisted by the TSA program and established its method of evaluation to determine the effectiveness of its program. The project performance report should relate the activities during the report period to the project's objectives and analyze the effectiveness of the program. Accordingly, the report should include, but need not be limited to the following:

1. (1) A comparison of actual accomplishments to the objectives established for that period, including:

   1. (i) The number of low-income families assisted in improving their housing conditions or in obtaining affordable adequate housing.
   2. (ii) The number of Rural Development borrowers who were delinquent or being foreclosed who were assisted in resolving their financial problems.
   3. (iii) The number of households assisted in obtaining adequate housing by the TSA program through new construction and/or rehabilitation.
2. (2) Reasons why, if established objectives are not met.
3. (3) Problems, delays, or adverse conditions which will materially affect attainment of the TSA grant objectives, prevent the meeting of time schedules or objectives, or preclude the attainment of project work elements during established time periods. This disclosure shall be accompanied by a statement of the action taken or contemplated and any Federal assistance needed to resolve the situation.
4. (4) Objectives established for the next reporting period, sufficiently detailed to identify the type of assistance to be provided, the number and type of families to be assisted, etc.

(d) The State Director will review the reports, comments, and recommendations forwarded by the District Director within five working days of receipt.

1. (1) If the reports indicate satisfactory progress, the State Director will forward the original to the National Office with any comments or suggestions and return the remaining copy to the grantee through the District Director with a copy of the comments or recommendations.
2. (2) If the reports indicate unsatisfactory progress, the State Director will recommend appropriate action to resolve the indicated problem(s). The State Director has the discretion to not authorize further advances where the progress of the project is unsatisfactory. The State Director will notify the grantee through the District Director of a decision not to authorize further advances and advise the grantee of its appeal rights under subpart B of part 1900 of this chapter.
3. (3) A copy of the memorandum returning the unsatisfactory reports will be forwarded to the National Office together with the State Director's decision, comments and recommendations, if appropriate.