(b) Requirements for incremental risk modeling. For purposes of calculating the incremental risk measure, the incremental risk model must:

1. (1) Measure incremental risk over a one-year time horizon and at a one-tail, 99.9 percent confidence level, either under the assumption of a constant level of risk, or under the assumption of constant positions.

   1. (i) A constant level of risk assumption means that the Board-regulated institution rebalances, or rolls over, its trading positions at the beginning of each liquidity horizon over the one-year horizon in a manner that maintains the Board-regulated institution's initial risk level. The Board-regulated institution must determine the frequency of rebalancing in a manner consistent with the liquidity horizons of the positions in the portfolio. The liquidity horizon of a position or set of positions is the time required for a Board-regulated institution to reduce its exposure to, or hedge all of its material risks of, the position(s) in a stressed market. The liquidity horizon for a position or set of positions may not be less than the shorter of three months or the contractual maturity of the position.
   2. (ii) A constant position assumption means that the Board-regulated institution maintains the same set of positions throughout the one-year horizon. If a Board-regulated institution uses this assumption, it must do so consistently across all portfolios.
   3. (iii) A Board-regulated institution's selection of a constant position or a constant risk assumption must be consistent between the Board-regulated institution's incremental risk model and its comprehensive risk model described in section 209 of this subpart, if applicable.
   4. (iv) A Board-regulated institution's treatment of liquidity horizons must be consistent between the Board-regulated institution's incremental risk model and its comprehensive risk model described in section 209, if applicable.
2. (2) Recognize the impact of correlations between default and migration events among obligors.
3. (3) Reflect the effect of issuer and market concentrations, as well as concentrations that can arise within and across product classes during stressed conditions.
4. (4) Reflect netting only of long and short positions that reference the same financial instrument.
5. (5) Reflect any material mismatch between a position and its hedge.

6. (6) Recognize the effect that liquidity horizons have on dynamic hedging strategies. In such cases, a Board-regulated institution must:

   1. (i) Choose to model the rebalancing of the hedge consistently over the relevant set of trading positions;
   2. (ii) Demonstrate that the inclusion of rebalancing results in a more appropriate risk measurement;
   3. (iii) Demonstrate that the market for the hedge is sufficiently liquid to permit rebalancing during periods of stress; and
   4. (iv) Capture in the incremental risk model any residual risks arising from such hedging strategies.
7. (7) Reflect the nonlinear impact of options and other positions with material nonlinear behavior with respect to default and migration changes.
8. (8) Maintain consistency with the Board-regulated institution's internal risk management methodologies for identifying, measuring, and managing risk.

(c) Calculation of incremental risk capital requirement. The incremental risk capital requirement is the greater of:

1. (1) The average of the incremental risk measures over the previous 12 weeks; or
2. (2) The most recent incremental risk measure.