(b)

1. (1) This section applies to all members of the active militia who have been lawfully ordered to any type of state duty pursuant to this code or any type of duty pursuant to Title 32 of the United States Code. For purposes of jurisdiction of this section, receipt of a lawful verbal or written order to report shall constitute sufficient evidence for purposes of establishing jurisdiction, however, jurisdiction may be contested as provided in the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, or the Manual for Courts-Martial, California.
2. (2) This section does not apply to offenses committed by members of the active militia who were not in a duty status or not ordered to a duty status at the time of the offense or omission, unless it is alleged that the member engaged in an affirmative act or omission that established a connection between the offense and service in the active militia. Jurisdiction shall exist in all circumstances regardless of where the offense was committed.
3. (3) Nothing in this section precludes any other military or civilian authority from exercising its jurisdiction over any act or omission that violates any local, state, or federal law. Pursuant to Sections 100, 101, 102, and 103, and Article 36 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, the Governor as Commander-in-Chief of the State Militia may promulgate regulations for this section, which may include guidance similar to that which is provided for the punitive articles of the Uniform Code of Military Justice in Part IV of the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States. Unless otherwise specified, the statute of limitations for the offenses in this section is as provided for in Section 843(b)(1) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

(c) For purposes of this section, “sexual harassment” means conduct that involves an unwelcome sexual advance, a request for sexual favors, or deliberate or repeated offensive comments or gestures of a sexual nature, towards, from, or in the presence of any person or persons, if any of the following apply:

1. (1) Submission to the conduct was made either explicitly or implicitly a term or condition of a person’s job, pay, or career.
2. (2) Submission to or rejection of the conduct by a person was used, or threatened to be used, as a basis for career or employment decisions affecting that person.
3. (3) The conduct had the purpose or effect of unreasonably interfering with any person’s work performance or created an intimidating, hostile, or offensive working environment for any person, and was so severe or pervasive that a reasonable person or a reasonable victim would have perceived that the work environment was hostile or offensive.