- (a) Circumstances. A releasee or parolee who is in custody under a hold and is undergoing prosecution on criminal charges shall be eligible for a prereturn hearing unless there has been an adequate substitute as defined in subsection (b) below.
(b) Adequate Substitute for Prereturn Hearing. A prereturn hearing shall be deemed not necessary if any of the following occurs:
(1) Felony Charges Pending.
- (A) A criminal preliminary hearing at which probable cause is found, providing the person has been given notice prior to the criminal preliminary hearing that the preliminary hearing will act as a substitute for a prereturn hearing.
- (B) Waiver of the criminal preliminary hearing, providing the person has been given notice prior to the waiver that such a waiver will act as a waiver of a prereturn hearing. (If the person waives the timeliness of the criminal preliminary hearing, such waiver shall also serve as a waiver of the timeliness of the prereturn hearing providing the person has been given prior notice.)
- (2) Misdemeanor Charges Pending. A court conviction which occurs within thirty calendar days of the placing of the hold, providing the person has been given notice that a conviction will act as a substitute for the prereturn hearing.
- (c) Purpose. The hearing officer shall determine whether or not there is probable cause to believe the outpatient or parolee violated the conditions of release or conditions of parole.
- (d) Location. The hearing shall be held at a location near where the violation is alleged to have occurred.
(e) Results.
- (1) If the hearing officer finds probable cause to believe the outpatient violated the conditions of release/parole, the Parole and Community Services Division may retain the person in custody under the hold pending adjudication of the criminal charges.
- (2) If probable cause is not found, the hearing officer shall so advise the Parole and Community Services Division, and the hold shall be removed immediately.
Note: Authority cited: Section 3156, Welfare and Institutions Code. Reference: In Re LaCroix, 12 Cal.3d 146 (1974).
History
1. Amendment of subsection (e)(1) filed 6-29-2000; operative 7-29-2000 (Register 2000, No. 26).