1. (a) On a case-by-case basis, determining the minimum time interval between transmissions of information about the location of the individual supervised person under parole supervision shall be based on the following, which shall include, but not be limited to:

   1. (1) The resources of the department.
   2. (2) The criminal history and case factors of the supervised person under parole supervision.
   3. (3) The safety of the victim of the supervised person under parole supervision.
   4. (4) The most current technology available to the department.

2. (b) The standard for the accuracy of the information identifying the location of the supervised person under parole supervision shall be based on the following, which shall include, but not be limited to:

   1. (1) The need to identify the location of the supervised person proximate to the location of the supervised person's residence or location of a crime.
   2. (2) Resources of the department.
   3. (3) The need to avoid false indications of continuous electronic monitoring violations.

The department establishes the following minimum performance standards for a continuous electronic monitoring system to enhance public safety:

Note: Authority cited: Sections 5058 and 5058.3, Penal Code. Reference: Sections 3010, 3010.1, 3010.2, 3010.3, 3010.4, 3010.5, 3010.6, 3010.7, 3010.8, 3010.9 and 5054, Penal Code.

History

1. New section filed 2-16-2010 as an emergency; operative 2-16-2010 (Register 2010, No. 8). Pursuant to Penal Code section 5058.3(c), a Certificate of Compliance must be transmitted to OAL by 7-26-2010 or emergency language will be repealed by operation of law on the following day.

2. Certificate of Compliance as to 2-16-2010 order transmitted to OAL 7-1-2010 and filed 8-13-2010 (Register 2010, No. 33).

3. Change without regulatory effect amending section filed 7-1-2024 pursuant to section 100, title 1, California Code of Regulations (Register 2024, No. 27).