Cal. Code Regs. tit. 15, § 3269.5
(f) Bed Assignments. The existence of predatory case factors precludes an incarcerated person from being assigned to DDP-designated housing areas unless they have met the minimum exclusionary periods identified in subsection 3269.5(h). The following are predatory case factors that preclude an incarcerated person from being assigned to DDP-designated housing areas unless minimum exclusionary periods have been met:
(4) Documented in-custody conduct that demonstrates victimizing or manipulative behavior against an individual with a disability, including when an incarcerated person is found guilty of a Rules Violation Report (RVR) for any of the following charges against a person with a disability:
(h) The following chart provides the minimum exclusionary periods for predatory factors that are to be considered when housing other incarcerated persons with an incarcerated person in the DDP:
Predatory Case Factor
Minimum Exclusionary Period
Found guilty of an in-custody sexual offense, or an attempt (e.g., rape, forcible sodomy, oral copulation, sexual battery with aggravating factors, etc.).
Permanently excluded from DDP-designated housing and housing with an incarcerated person in the DDP.
New commitments to CDCR with documented incident(s) of sexual offenses against individuals with a physical, mental, or developmental disability.
Excluded from DDP-designated housing and housing with an incarcerated person in the DDP for five years from date of reception to CDCR.
Single-cell status due to in-cell violence.
Must be double-celled during the previous two years without in-cell violence.
Documented in-custody conduct (e.g., substantiated information in confidential C-File) that demonstrates victimizing or manipulative behavior against an individual with a physical, mental, or developmental disability, including when an incarcerated person is found guilty of an RVR for any of the following offenses against a person with a disability:
Three years has passed from most recent date of documentation.
Staff should use discretion and sound correctional judgement when determining appropriate housing for incarcerated persons in the DDP. Each decision made on the basis of this exclusionary factor shall be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. An incarcerated person may have committed one of the listed offenses, but it may have not been against an individual with a disability, or the circumstances surrounding the violation may lead the reviewer to believe the offense was not predatory in nature.
• Battery
• Assault
• Criminal Threats
• Extorting
• Stalking
• Theft
(i) Incarcerated persons, including those in the DDP, who have any of the identified predatory case factors specified in subsection 3269.5(f), and who have not met the established exclusionary period in subsection 3269.5(h), shall not:
(l) Custody staff, when reviewing double-celling eligibility, shall conduct an assessment to determine if the incarcerated person meets any of the predatory criteria, as specified in subsection 3269.5(f).
(2) Custody staff shall document their double-celling determination by noting either of the following in the comments section of the automated Classification Committee Chrono (Rev. 05/19), incorporated by reference, and the Initial Housing Review:
Note: Authority cited: Section 5058, Penal Code. Reference: Section 5054, Penal Code; and Quine v. Beard, No. C 14-02726 JST, Clark v. California 123 F. 3d 1267 (9th Cir. 1997), Clark v. California (2002) USDC-ND (No. C-96-1486-CRB).
1. New section filed 6-3-2025; operative 10-1-2025 (Register 2025, No. 23).