Cal. Code Regs. tit. 14, § 851.9
(a) Default Matrix Option for Matching Tugs to Tankers: The tug or tugs used for an escorted transit shall be able to provide sufficient braking force to stop the escorted tanker from a speed of 5 knots through the water. The braking force of the tug(s) shall match the tanker's displacement, as indicated in the following matrix:
(2) Location of current readings: The specific current velocity to be used in conjunction with the matrix shall be the published readings for the following locations:
(E) The Carquinez Bridge - the predicted current velocity in Carquinez Strait shall apply to vessels in zone 6.
How to use the Default Matrix Option for Matching Tugs to Tankers: The matrix provides current velocities for slack water, 1, 2, 3, and 4 knots. The slack water column shall be used only when the water is truly slack. The 1 knot column shall be used for any velocity above 0 and equal to 1. The 2 knot column shall be used for any velocity above 1 and equal to 2, and so on up to the 4 knot maximum.
In those situations where the current velocity is above 4 knots, such as may occur at the Golden Gate, the tank vessel requiring an escort tug shall reschedule the transit to a time when the current velocity drops to 4 knots or below.
Zones 1 and 2
Zones 4 and 6
Assisting Current
slack
1 kt
2 kts
3 kts
4 kts
slack
1 kt
2 kts
3 kts
4 kts
Displacement*
Braking Force in kips (1,000 pounds of force)
0 to < 20
20
20
30
40
40
40
50
70
90
110
20 to < 30
20
30
40
50
60
50
70
90
120
160
30 to < 40
30
40
50
60
70
60
90
120
160
210
40 to < 50
30
40
60
70
90
70
110
150
200
250
50 to < 60
40
60
70
90
110
100
140
190
250
320
60 to < 80
50
70
90
120
140
120
180
250
330
420
80 to < 100
60
80
110
140
180
150
220
300
400
520
100 to < 120
70
100
130
170
210
180
270
370
500
650
120 to < 140
80
110
150
190
240
210
310
430
580
760
140 to < 160
90
140
190
240
310
240
350
490
660
860
160 to < 180
100
150
210
270
350
260
390
550
740
970
180 to < 200
110
170
230
300
390
**
**
**
**
**
200 to < 220
120
180
250
330
420
**
**
**
**
**
* 1,000 long tons
** The channel depth in zones 4 and 6 limits vessels that may use the channel to those drawing less than 35 feet. This table does not address vessels in zones 4 and 6 with a displacement greater than 180,000 long tons because such vessels would draw more than 35 feet and would thus not be allowed into these zones.
(b) Alternative To The Default Matrix for Matching Tugs to Tankers: Measurement methodologies other than those used to establish the Default Matrix may be used instead of, or in addition to, the Matrix as follows:
(1) Alternate Compliance Model for Escort Tugs: Tug owner/operators may propose an alternate method for measuring the braking force of any tug (in kips). Such alternate method may be used to demonstrate that the tug can provide higher steering or braking forces (in kips) than the simple bollard pull measurement would indicate. An alternate measurement may only be submitted once in any 12 month period and shall comply with the following:
(A) the owner/operator shall assure that the following are included when developing a methodology for calculating an alternate braking force for a given escort tug:
(B) the measurement must be conducted by a marine architect or engineer approved by the Administrator:
(C) the alternate model and the resultant measurement shall be approved by the Administrator before the alternate model may be used to match a tanker to a tug or tugs. The Administrator shall approve the alternate model if it provides both of the following:
(2) Alternate Compliance Model for Tankers: Tanker owner/operators may develop a model for the vessels in their fleet relative to the steering and braking demands of the vessels, and the braking capabilities of tugs. The steering and braking demands established by the alternate model may be used instead of the Default Matrix to match escort tugs to the tankers. An alternate compliance model may only be submitted once in any 12-month period and shall comply with the following:
(A) the measurement must be conducted by a marine architect or engineer approved by the Administrator. The tanker owner/operator shall submit the name of the marine architect or engineer to the Administrator for approval prior to having that individual or his/her company conduct an alternate model:
(B) the alternate model and the resultant measurements shall be approved by the Administrator before the alternate model may be used to match a tanker to a tug or tugs. The Administrator shall approve the alternate model if the following conditions are met:
(c) The Administrator may allow deviations from compliance for the matching of tugs to laden tankers when these vessels make short transits from the berth to berth within a zone and are assisted by docking tugs and transiting at speeds less than 8 knots.
(d) Maximum number of tugs to be used during an escorted transit:
(e) Speed limits for tankers are as follows:
(1) tankers that use the Default Matrix as provided in this section shall not proceed at a speed in excess of 10 knots through the water in Zones 1, 2, 3 and 5, nor more than 8 knots through the water in Zones 4 and 6, with the following qualifications:
(B) the tanker shall proceed at a safe speed. The determination of a safe speed shall include, but not be limited to:
(f) Crew requirements:
(g) Equipment requirements:
Note: Authority cited: Sections 8670.17.2(a) and 8670.23.1(d), Government Code. Reference: Section 8670.23.1(e)(1), Government Code.
1. New section filed 5-6-93 as an emergency; operative 5-6-93 (Register 93, No. 19). A Certificate of Compliance must be transmitted to OAL 9-3-93 or emergency language will be repealed by operation of law on the following day.
2. New section refiled 8-16-93 as an emergency; operative 9-4-93 (Register 93, No. 34). A Certificate of Compliance must be transmitted to OAL by 1-3-94 or emergency language will be repealed by operation of law on the following day.
3. Certificate of Compliance as to 8-16-93 order including amendment of subsections (d)-(f) transmitted to OAL 11-30-93 and filed 1-11-94 (Register 94, No. 2).
4. Repealer and new section filed 11-8-96; operative 1-1-97 (Register 96, No. 45).
5. New subsections (a)(1) and (a)(2), repealer of subsections (c)(1) and (c)(2), and new subsections (c)-(c)(2) filed 5-19-2000; operative 6-18-2000 (Register 2000, No. 20).
6. Editorial correction reinstating section as it existed prior to amendments printed in error in Register 2000, No. 20 (Register 2000, No. 42).
7. Amendment filed 9-4-2001; operative 10-4-2001 (Register 2001, No. 36).